Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
12 posts total
Dave Rahardja (he/him)

Hey, go cancel that streaming subscription you’re not using. Go on, cancel it. Do it right now.

It’s trivial to resubscribe when you need to. You don’t need it right now. Cancel it.

Show previous comments
leberschnitzel

@drahardja my personal way of doing subscriptions: I cancel them just after signing up.
It's a moment I'm interacting with it anyway, I won't forget it in the future, and even if I notice it shortly after it ran out I already saved a day or two.

J.H.Noyes

@drahardja

Fuck that. Don't resubscribe. They should pay you to watch their drivel. But since they won't the least you can do is turn on your VPN and torrent like it's 2009.

Григорий Клюшников

Never had any streaming subscriptions in my entire life 😎
Is it, like, the same as piracy, but they also take money from your account every month and limit what you can do with the content?

Dave Rahardja (he/him)

Every day, we stray further from the light of the #HIG.

Although the words “Email or Phone Number” appears to be a placeholder within a text field, and the word “required” appears to be a label, the word “required” is actually the placeholder, and the “Email…” text is a permanent label.

Relevant section: developer.apple.com/design/hum

#Apple #macOS 15 #Sequoia #HumanInterface #UX

Diane 🕵

@drahardja

Bhaggeag

So wrong looking!

If it's going to be a label it shouldn't be in the white box!?!?!

Show previous comments
Angry Sun
@drahardja it's wrong a lot but it's still right way more often, enough that it saves me a ton of time using it for things,
erica_sea55

@drahardja inevitably pushed by people who know nothing about how it works (aka bosses).

Dave Rahardja (he/him)

Much as I dislike the theft of human labor that feeds many of the #generativeAI products we see today, I have to agree with @pluralistic that #copyright law is the wrong way to address the problem.

To frame the issue concretely: think of whom copyright law has benefited in the past, and then explain how it would benefit the individual creator when it is applied to #AI. (Hint: it won’t.)

Copyright law is already abused and extended to an absurd degree today. It already overreaches. It impoverishes society by putting up barriers to creation and allowing toll-collectors to exist between citizen artists and their audience.

*Labor* law is likely what we need to lean on. #unions and #guilds protect creators in a way that copyright cannot. Inequality and unequal bargaining power that lead to exploitation of artists and workers is what we need to address head-on.

Copyright will not save us.

“AI "art" and uncanniness”

pluralistic.net/2024/05/13/spo

Much as I dislike the theft of human labor that feeds many of the #generativeAI products we see today, I have to agree with @pluralistic that #copyright law is the wrong way to address the problem.

To frame the issue concretely: think of whom copyright law has benefited in the past, and then explain how it would benefit the individual creator when it is applied to #AI. (Hint: it won’t.)

Show previous comments
pinkdrunkenelephants

@drahardja @pluralistic Labor laws would in no way stop AI.

We need federal laws directly banning the tech and the use of it. With jail time. That's the only thing that could stop it.

Ron Miller

@drahardja @pluralistic I'm not sure why you're framing it as either/or. Both laws should be applied when it comes to stealing IP or abusing labor.

Filene

@drahardja @pluralistic I've been actually thinking Freedom of Speech, freedom from compulsion to speech, and freedom from speech that might incriminate you, all apply to being pushed or regulated to use an AI. 🤔. I can see this having applications in labor law, for sure.

Dave Rahardja (he/him)

Here’s a clear example of how aggressive the image processing has become on newer iPhones. This is a comparison between the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the iPhone 11 Pro Max, taking photos of distant text at equal magnification. Note how the 15 Pro Max’s image pipeline has made up all the details.

EDIT: I’m going to drop mentions of “AI” and “hallucinating” here because I think it’s conjuring up the wrong mental models in readers’ heads. What’s likely happening is over-eager noise reduction and sharpening (which may or may not have pattern matching) creating details where none exist. Every phone does some amount of NR and sharpening, but later iPhones are super aggressive in this regard, so much so that the results often depart from what we accept as “reality”.

#apple #iphone #imageProcessing

Original video: facebook.com/watch?v=885196069

Here’s a clear example of how aggressive the image processing has become on newer iPhones. This is a comparison between the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the iPhone 11 Pro Max, taking photos of distant text at equal magnification. Note how the 15 Pro Max’s image pipeline has made up all the details.

EDIT: I’m going to drop mentions of “AI” and “hallucinating” here because I think it’s conjuring up the wrong mental models in readers’ heads. What’s likely happening is over-eager noise reduction and sharpening...

Show previous comments
Miguel Arroz

@drahardja And if they already had optics good enough to capture that text on the 11, it’s totally unnecessary to do this now. If anything, optics and sensors got better over time.

Steve 🇨🇦🇺🇦

@drahardja I can’t re-create that behaviour with my 15 Pro Max. I wonder if I have a turned off somewhere? Or have they re-tuned it?

Григорий Клюшников

At this point it's a misnomer to call this "photography". It's not photography if the post-processing pipeline makes its own artistic decisions like performing object segmentation to treat different parts of the scene differently, or using any AI whatsoever to influence the output. I'm fine with things like stacking multiple exposures (to reduce noise) or local tone mapping (to improve dynamic range), but this shit?..

Dave Rahardja (he/him)

#AI #LLM is gunking up the web, especially for lesser-represented languages. Spammers are creating garbage English language content using LLMs, then translating it into *multiple languages* at the same time, using Machine Translation, presumably to generate clickbait ad revenue in several languages at once.

In English, such gunk accounts for some 9% of total sampled web content. But in languages with less representation on the Internet, the figures could be much higher. In Malay, it’s something like 26%, and in Swahili it’s nearly HALF of everything found on the web.

Paper [pdf]: “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”

arxiv.org/pdf/2401.05749.pdf

#AI #LLM is gunking up the web, especially for lesser-represented languages. Spammers are creating garbage English language content using LLMs, then translating it into *multiple languages* at the same time, using Machine Translation, presumably to generate clickbait ad revenue in several languages at once.

Dave Rahardja (he/him)

This is excellent reporting. Reuters somehow got their hands on seven years of internal #Tesla service records, as well as internal communications from service technicians and engineers.

What they found is pretty shocking to me. Repeated catastrophic failure of suspension parts. Power steering suddenly disabling itself. Evidence of denying warranty coverage. Failures that forced a recall in China that continued to be shipped in the US.

Pretty damning stuff.

#cars

“Tesla blamed drivers for failures of parts it long knew were defective”

reuters.com/investigates/speci

This is excellent reporting. Reuters somehow got their hands on seven years of internal #Tesla service records, as well as internal communications from service technicians and engineers.

What they found is pretty shocking to me. Repeated catastrophic failure of suspension parts. Power steering suddenly disabling itself. Evidence of denying warranty coverage. Failures that forced a recall in China that continued to be shipped in the US.

Show previous comments
🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

@drahardja

> Failures that forced a recall in China that continued to be shipped in the US.

One of the major ironies of life is that the horrible, mean, nasty, evil Chinese government (and I'm only being a little bit sarcastic: the Chinese government *is* vile in many ways!) offers its citizens far better consumer protection than does the good guy (totally sarcastic here, mind) USA.

This leads to an interesting, and unexpected, phenomenon.

(1/2)

remote procedure chris

@drahardja i can't even make a post dramatically exaggerating the absence of regulatory action against tesla at this point. "next year we're gonna find out they just randomly explode" like there's just nowhere left to go

Show previous comments
lobster

@drahardja

I have three real nightshade in the garden. Only one flowered this year. Hopefully to seed. I have been using AI models (wellblow up dolls really ... sorry enough about me ... 😆

ave 🐀

@drahardja seen a couple of tools like this show and then promptly be defeated over the last year :/

Condalmo.

@drahardja I have a crisp $1 bill that says that image was created by AI

Dave Rahardja (he/him)

@benfry Sad to hear this but…where did all that money go?

Dave Rahardja (he/him)

This #LifeExpectancy chart is pretty stark.

“"Oh, we can't have anything but an American solution to these issues – we can't listen to other countries."

"International studies are not the flavor of the month – they never will be," says [John] Haaga [a retired director at the NIH]. "The problem with foreign countries is that they're not in someone's congressional district."”

npr.org/sections/health-shots/

Go Up