Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
7 posts total
lori

Once again begging people to give up on "if you're not paying for the product you are the product" because I've seen so many people who now think if you are paying for a product your data is totally safe now forever because if I'm paying the company money they don't need to sell my data

When instead they could also sell your data and get Two Money

Show previous comments
Diane 🕵

@lori

My saying is

"You never get more than you pay for.

But you can certainly get less"

Alfredo

@lori "If you're not paying you're the product" is not equivalent to "if you're paying your data is safe". So the latter can be false, and yet the former is true.

Nafeon the Beaw

@lori also people now think there is a catch with the fediverse as well.

lori

going to drown everyone on the phantom dust subreddit in a swamp because i'm trying to troubleshoot something with this game and every. fucking. thread. where someone is asking about this the answer is just "join our discord and ask there!"

eat absolute shit, fuck you

lori

the world wont' get better unless we start screaming at people for doing this

lori

Fedi I have a weird request that is hard to just search for, so I want to crowdfund some suggestions, because what I'm looking for is...weird to even categorize.

I want suggestions for things that are
- Competitive games
- That utilize toys or other physical components (besides, say, just cards or board game pieces)
- That can be customized or tuned in some way

Examples of what I mean, some of which these categories are really the only things they have in common, are:

- Slot cars, mini 4wd, RC car racing
- Bakugan, Beyblade, Bdaman
- Robot fighting

They can either be branded packaged goods, or homebrew/open/freeform kinds of things. But I really love these types of physical object games aside from traditional board games, and I like customizing them, either by having components that can be swapped around for different loadouts, or things that are completely custom.

Fedi I have a weird request that is hard to just search for, so I want to crowdfund some suggestions, because what I'm looking for is...weird to even categorize.

I want suggestions for things that are
- Competitive games
- That utilize toys or other physical components (besides, say, just cards or board game pieces)
- That can be customized or tuned in some way

lori

(this sort of description is why I refer to darts as Beyblades for adults, because at the end of the day you get the same fun of combining three parts that come in cool colors or whatever and affect the movement of the object)

campbell

@lori Paintball guns and lacrosse sticks have these qualities, and I’m realizing that I was way into this exact kind of thing growing up because I wanted both despite having basically no real way to use them

lori

Never forget that things like "queer owned", 'black owned", "woman owned" businesses are still business and you still need to evaluate them as businesses. I've seen so many of these get away with poor business practices, extremely bad mismanagement, in some cases pure cluelessness at business and in other cases being outright scams and grifts. If someone is trying to sell you something, don't let having a common identity with them make you stop thinking of them as a business.

lori

(This brought to you right now from people using Cohost being queer owned to try to guilt you from talking about their poor business choices but there's also a million other times I've thought about this. A queer grifter is still a grifter. Treat anyone trying to sell you anything as suspect until proven otherwise)

archer

@lori
What do we think of the ethics behind kickstarting a “Proudly Republican Business” that promptly evaporates after reaching funding goals?

lori

As many of you know, I posted recently about my experiences and outlook on Kagi, the paid search engine. It's gotten some positive press recently, ironically right after I made my blog post about why I no longer liked or trusted it. This blog post was called "Why I Lost Faith In Kagi" and was a pretty simple quick collection of my thoughts that I primarily wrote so it'd be easier to find again later to link to people when discussing Kagi versus making it a fedi thread I couldn't search for easily later. Across the four social media platforms I linked this blog post on, I'd say it got a total of about 40 likes and few reblogs.

d-shoot.net/kagi.html

I say this because this morning I woke up to an email from Kagi's CEO, Vlad, who had seen the post and was upset about it. I have an email address listed on my blog (which is why I didn't bother removing it from these logs), which is what he sent his emails to. I am posting this entire email chain in this thread and will briefly post my thoughts about it, but I feel like it's something that needs to be seen. Please take note of the subject of the email as well (EDIT: It got cropped out sorry, the subject is "Fatih [sic] can not be lost"). Also, since the alt text would get extremely long with some of the transcripts, I've provided a text dump of the emails here for screen reader users and will offer a more abridged description in the alt text: d-shoot.net/files/kagiemails.t

As many of you know, I posted recently about my experiences and outlook on Kagi, the paid search engine. It's gotten some positive press recently, ironically right after I made my blog post about why I no longer liked or trusted it. This blog post was called "Why I Lost Faith In Kagi" and was a pretty simple quick collection of my thoughts that I primarily wrote so it'd be easier to find again later to link to people when discussing Kagi versus making it a fedi thread I couldn't search for easily...

Email from Vlad to me: Hi there

I saw this today
https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

Almost everything here is opposite of what I stand for. I am happy to bridge the gap and clarify the misunderstandings on a call. Would you like the opportunity o talk directly?

Vlad
Email from me to Vlad: Thanks for reaching out, but no, I would not. I am not interested in being cornered into a call by the owner of a business because I made a blog post about it.
Email from Vlad to me: I am not looking to corner anyone. I want to clarify things, the same you would react if someone wrote things about you that are not true. 

At least I can share a link on AI integration philosophy so that you can understand that we are very careful about AI.

https://blog.kagi.com/kagi-ai-search#philosophy

In fact, when you go to kagi.com as a new user, AI is mentioned exactly zero times.


And this is the Kagi origin story, and why I am doing this.

https://dkb.io/post/DEPR_kagi-interview

Everything else, there is nuance to it that you missed in your blog post. We are all human.


Best
Vlad
Email from me to Vlad: I may not have spelled this out explicitly in my previous reply but I will do so here: I am not interested in getting more replies from you on this subject.  Declining a call does not mean I want you to argue with me about Kagi in email either.  I do not trust you, personally, either and do not want to have a conversation about that.

And for the record, I read that blog page already.  If you had read my own blog post, you would notice that I link to it.
Show previous comments
★ blue-caller ☆

@lori its always a good sign when a tech CEO harasses a stranger because they feel threatened by a single, well thought out objection.

David Gerard

@lori i am sorry to warn you that your original post is right now front page on HN news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

Kali

@lori when I heard about kagi, I was confused as to why anyone would want to be logged into a search engine since that’s even more PII than your ip address + session fingerprint

what happens to the data they collect when the NSA tells the German government that they’re in fourteen eyes? what about when they’re acquired?

lori

Cohost's financial update is a poster child for what I and others have been saying for a long time now: the internet won't survive without decentralization. You can't just make the next Twitter or Reddit or Tumblr. That's a joke. Cohost was against decentralization but they've now learned why centralization isn't feasible: only massive corporations with infinite VC can afford it, and they hemorrhage that money and close eventually too.

The internet is too expensive to work this way and it won't long term. We just got complacent while there was enough VC to go around. It's pets dot com again. It doesn't last.

And this isn't even about AP/fedi, while I like fedi this is true with or without it. We have to go back to having websites. Not The(tm) website for whatever, but lots of them. If you don't want to go to more than one? Too bad, it's how things will be regardless. Having One website isn't sustainable for corporations and isn't even vaguely feasible for little guys.

You have to have lots of websites. I can run a small community for a bit of my entertainment budget for the month or donations from a handful of users who like what I'm running. You can run a mastodon instance for a small crowd for very little. You can run a website off an old laptop laying around. You cannot run a 130k user site and pay you and your friends $94k a year to run it. It's not sustainable. I wish it was. It isn't. Sites have to stay small, and there have to be enough of them spread out to spread out the financial load to hobbyist levels. Sorry that you can't make a living running a site for your friends to hang out on, but it's just how the math works out. Reddit can't make money doing it, Twitter can't make money doing it, Patreon can't...they only survive on being Huge Corporations Who Can Bleed Money. You can replicate bleeding money on a small scale all you want but I wouldn't advise it. You can however run a forum for your friends for the cost of Netflix or whatever.

Cohost's financial update is a poster child for what I and others have been saying for a long time now: the internet won't survive without decentralization. You can't just make the next Twitter or Reddit or Tumblr. That's a joke. Cohost was against decentralization but they've now learned why centralization isn't feasible: only massive corporations with infinite VC can afford it, and they hemorrhage that money and close eventually too.

Show previous comments
:blahaj: Why Not Zoidberg? 🦑

@lori i am still not convinced that the federated model will work well with things like a reddit alternative or even an instagram alternative. We'll see, I won't abandon Reddit until I have to, but it seems it will be easier to just ignore an alternative and just go back to the official game forums for the games I like to talk about than to find the best Lemmy group for them.

Lauren Hetherington

@lori oh yikes. I was vaguely interested in cohost when it started. Unfortunate that they're having trouble.

Zennith

@lori I wasn't really aware of Cohost till now, but...

$46k in expenses per month on $5k monthly revenues? Whoaaaa. Yeah that isn't a business model. ^.-.^;;;

Like, sure, running a website or platform for passion, I love the idea. If they're rich and running a *big* website with *big* passion, that's great too!

But if someone is putting out a financial report, they're in srs business territory, and can't be mucking around with that INSANE negative cash flow. WHEW.

Go Up