Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jessamyn

@mike @petersuber @OpenAlex I, too, have a name that is the same as another author and I found, contrary to its front-page claim, I was not disambiguated from her. Now to see if there's a way to help it learn which Jessamyn is which (since our bodies of work are really entirely different).

9 comments
Mike Taylor 🦕

@jessamyn @petersuber @OpenAlex Hopefully you find a way to "claim" some works, and disclaim others. Let me know!

Bodling

@mike @jessamyn @petersuber @OpenAlex The odd result upon searching for my own name was that so many unrelated (to me) results showed up because of the abbreviation "Bodl." referring to the Bodleian Library.

Truncation is not always your friend.

Ben Bolker

@mike @jessamyn @petersuber @OpenAlex I too would love it if there were a way to curate lists. I need to check to see if there is a way to restrict searches to 'peer-reviewed items only', as there seems to be a lot of what I would consider chaff ...

Ben Bolker

@mike @jessamyn @petersuber @OpenAlex ... or more generally to correct metadata. I appreciate that it's a SUPER hard problem (e.g., how do you validate suggested corrections/edits at scale?), but otherwise lots of manual post-processing is needed. One trivial example: two redundant entries here - openalex.org/works?page=1&filt

DELETED

@jessamyn @mike @petersuber @OpenAlex as I just discovered this project not sure what operating model they have versus user feedback, maybe raising github issues? As an open source project they could use such feedback to iterate and improve.

petersuber

@jessamyn @mike @OpenAlex
Sounds like #ORCID integration would solve these problems, and the ORCID API might put it within reach. Here's hoping.

petersuber

@jessamyn @mike @OpenAlex
FYI, I just found that it has a built-in filter for works "indexed by ORCID". That's not the same as using ORCID to disambiguate author names, but give it a try.

Marc Couture

@petersuber @jessamyn @mike @OpenAlex

I applaud the effort and believe in their approach. But, as others observed, there is much room for improvement (for instance, as to the access status: all my works have an OA version, but only 1/3 are labeled as such...).

Jessamyn

@petersuber @mike @OpenAlex Hey neat. That improves the output but it's still messy. Like, I was not alive when some of the works attributed to me (from the Other Jessamyn) were written. That should be a robot reality check. I mean, cleaning data is tough so I get it. I'm just surprised there's not an obvious way to report something amiss that is that basic

Go Up