W3C has posted that we are no longer active on X/Twitter and have directed all our followers here to Mastodon.
We are encouraging all W3C-related accounts to do the same.
Encourage your friends to follow us here!
W3C has posted that we are no longer active on X/Twitter and have directed all our followers here to Mastodon. We are encouraging all W3C-related accounts to do the same. Encourage your friends to follow us here! 154 comments
12
@jbzfn @w3c jbz - Google is one of the members of the WC3 : https://www.w3.org/membership/list/ @w3c Good call! In case this wasn't already considered or in the plans: may I suggest to run a script that creates a snapshot of all w3c account's messages at the Internet Archive / Wayback Machine? I suspect that some is already archived but worth processing it all. Preserving w3c account's history at a trusted third-party service like the IA would probably be handy in the future. At this point there is even less of an assurance that messages will persist but worth checking this out now. or, since they have control on the database, they may copy (also) each old tweet on here with the original date and time from the tweet since it's a script it would maybe create a copy on the Wayback Machine too @bluSCALE4 @w3c That's like asking a recovering drug addict why they don't continue to do drugs. Because it's a bad environment to be in! @mikey Can I give you all the medals for this and all the cookies too? This was perfect :) @mikey@neovibe.aipp @w3c It's more like telling Jesus Christ to stop preaching to heathens. @bluSCALE4 @w3c I'll tell you now w3c ain't Jesus and the ones causing the issues over there aren't about to listen to anything w3c has to say about the web. They barely can hear their own conscious speaking. Oh hi there! I guess that, in all probability, international antitrust laws prohibit our merger, right? 😎 I will follow anyway, although I don’t understand Dansk, but I see you have a habit of boosting interesting stuff. @w3c To the Wowrldwide Web Consortium, I address the board: What is going to happen when the Patents and Standard Interest Group Charter ends on March 31st, 2024? Would, instead of ending or renewing the charter, the WC3 be interested in addressing A.I. interactions and generations through Patent policies? Or if ending, is A.I. going to replace the Group? https://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/charter-2021.html Thank you. @adamatmullin @w3c Look, the PSIG is existing since 2004. So there is those 20 years in which I was the team contact. And frankly, we have sufficient intelligence in the group to not need too many stochastic parrots for the moment. @rigo @w3c Mr. Wenning, Esq., thank you - and thanks to all the PSIG, and the W3C, which have committed to maintaining standards in a highly over-interactive-data-transmitting-frontier). I haven't heard that word-of-the-day term in a long time. The further optional question: will the W3C ever consider producing standards for online generating prompt "auto-data" (A.I.) or is that process reserved for Department of Defense / National Academies (originating where the Internet came from)? @w3c@w3c.social im shocked you didnt do it earlier, considering you standarized the protocol lol @w3c @w3c @Em0nM4stodon I'm still hoping for the day that #scrimba and all my favourites from that other site join the fediverse. We've been on Mastodon since 2017 (see our profile: https://w3c.social/@w3c). We are just no longer are on both X/Twitter and Mastodon OK ... I'll bite ... Who are you and what do you do and does what ever it is you do matter to the ordinary person ...? Yes, I know I could Google the general gist, but if your leaving Xitter is such a big deal I want to know why :) No it isn't. Not everybody knows everything there is to know about everything ... or even thinks they do ... @MyView Thank you .. Interesting reading and in simple language ... tech people can be soo technical :) ... I have bookmarked it as looks like there's interesting reading in the references too ... Think I see why they left Xitter too ... @MyView @w3c wikipedia: "The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is the main international standards organization for the World Wide Web. Founded in 1994 and led by Tim Berners-Lee, the consortium is made up of member organizations that maintain full-time staff working together in the development of standards for the World Wide Web. As of 5 March 2023, W3C had 462 members.[3][2] W3C also engages in education and outreach, develops software and serves as an open forum for discussion about the Web." @w3c@w3c.social I would but I'm still unreasonably upset about the removal of the tag even if I understand the rationale and agree with the other two losses at the time (blink and marquee were really bad)🌟 Explore the enchanting world of @enigmaseduction on FanVue! 🚀 Dive into their profile for exclusive content and join the excitement: fanvue.com/enigmaseduction 🎉 Lets hope those pesky people of https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ will also join the fedi one day! Welcome to the Fediverse, @w3c You're late to your own tech :ablobcatgooglymlemjumping: We've been on Mastodon since 2017 (see our profile: https://w3c.social/@w3c). We are just no longer are on both X/Twitter and Mastodon @w3c probably not a great idea to break old links unnecessarily by making the account protected @w3c 100pcs/Lot Silicone Cover So, THE internet authority has decided to switch places. Let this sink in. If I still needed a sign to switch, this was it. @w3c can you snap your fingers and make w3c a TLD? then you could be @w3c@w3c.w3c @w3c but it's likely no one outside my community will see my comments because of the centralized block lists. So it goes. |
@w3c This is the way!