Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
30 comments
CaveDave

@boxy funny because this argument could be said about systems of measurment ... to the people who came up with the metic system

GlaireDaggers

@boxy "yes I know there are 14 standards already - and those standards are all *terrible*"

LisPi
@boxy When competing standards fail in the face of preferable competitors, they also become deprecated.

So it's not like it's a permanent state of things.

New standards can be needed, older standards can be deprecated. And then they can be brought back into recommendation when major flaws in the new standards that weren't noticed due to flaws in the evaluation process are noticed.

Or something new incorporating the better parts of both (and a bunch of compatibility stuff) can be made.
@boxy When competing standards fail in the face of preferable competitors, they also become deprecated.

So it's not like it's a permanent state of things.
rl_dane

@pixx @amin

At this point, I'm convinced that was @amin posting on an alt account 🤣

swooh

@boxy To be fair in regards to the original comic, USB-C was worth it since it’s the best of all worlds.

DELETED

@boxy why th fuck did you tag him as wayward vagabond from homestuck what is wrong with you

Sudrien

@boxy if I have to read that alt text I'm also reading it as "Truth coming out of her well"

AN/CRM-114

@boxy Every org has That Guy. Bonus points when That Guy comes up with a standard and doesn't even follow it in his own work. (It's always a guy)

Aral Balkan

@boxy Alt text, xkcd 927 standards:

HOW
STANDARDS PROLIFERATE:
SEE: A/C CHARGERS, CHARACTER ENCODINGS, INSTANT MESSAGING, ETC.)

SITUATION:
THERE ARE
14 COMPETING STANDARDS

Person A: 14?! RIDICULOUS!
WE NEED TO DEVELOP
ONE UNIVERSAL STANDARD THAT COVERS EVERYONE'S
USE CASES.

Person B: YEAH!

SITUATION:
THERE ARE
15 COMPETING STANDARDS.

EdBruce

@boxy
Seems to me when national/international groups create open standards we get Mastodon. When corporate enshittified standards are created we get the multitude of crappy standards.

#enshittification

Karl Higley

@boxy @tess I’ve literally received this response to a proposal before

(naturally I went off on them, for they had Earned It)

DELETED

@boxy this but with c / c++ project files. I don't like CMake OR sln!

Ethical Reasons

@boxy If every person who cares about doing a good job acts like that, then only people who don't care develop new standards.

liy

stop liking this post i accidentally stole the joke

Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
@boxy After all the best improvement to a codebase is deleting code.
Colin Watson

@boxy Alt text - that's not the WV from Homestuck, surely? The art style is completely different, and the WV isn't human.

ForeverAndaDay

@boxy As long as you aren't going in over your head and can maintain your standard long-term, you should be free to create whatever standard you want. If it's useful, people will use it and adapt it. Simple as

Zen_Fox.tar.gz

@boxy this XKCD comic has caused irreversible damage xD

Fluffery

@boxy introducing: forcing the competition to go underground
You wont have competition if there is none
Play dirty

BenAveling

@boxy nice cartoon. In a way, they’re both right. But they’re taking past each other, they’re taking about 2 utterly different things.
‘Improve somewhat’ is the complete polar opposite of ‘create a new standard to replace everything that already works’

NotThatDeep

@boxy@wetdry.world protocol doomers when someone suggests improving an existing protocol:

Go Up