3 comments
@jon They have never been super transparent with their methods. But they do own a ton of access points at this point that makes me think they have enough to make some good guesses. @joe , the point is that there is a lot of easy ways to get stats like this wrong. This is, however, a nice source to add to the list. |
@joe @Vivaldi , yes I had found that one. A bit unsure about the details there. Not a lot of information about how many sites and pages are included and no indication of number of users, just share of pageviews.