Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
abadidea

unity’s own explanation for deleting the ToS off their own website is… it wasn’t generating enough engagement

twitter.com/unity/status/17053

59 comments
green-threaded gay

@0xabad1dea pretty sure that's not how the law works even in the US

Veebs

@0xabad1dea you know when my drivers license just wasnt going viral enough i said, why does this even take up space in my wallet? only like two cops have wanted to see it ever? i shredded it.

Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
@0xabad1dea Holy shit it's like they're operated by a robot and there's no one with a brain capable of stopping it…
[SUYA] ひみつ :blabcatverified:
@0xabad1dea you know, it's been about a decade since anyone saw the waterpipes in this house, so I think it's time to rip them all out
Serenade :trans_lily:

@0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange Maybe they were working on it, but a dog ate their homework? /s

Reed Mideke

@0xabad1dea Well good news for them, TOS engagement is way up!

Johan | PD1JMB

@reedmideke @0xabad1dea

TOS "engagement" has been on 🔥 lately 😁

Shambolic Matter

@0xabad1dea We removed the fire extinguisher from the kitchen because it just wasn't being used very often

Will 💜

@0xabad1dea did...did they ask an LLM to write this reply for them

I have no earthly idea why someone would provide that justification otherwise

Irenes (many)

@0xabad1dea what truly boggles our mind is that some PR person, who somehow sleeps at night, presumably got the heads up that they were deleting the ToS in time to write a reactive comms document instructing the social media people to say that

and managed to do so with a straight face.

Bad Rob, Best Rob

@0xabad1dea

I always find that toc pages are a rich vein of SEO and engagement... /s

stux⚡

@0xabad1dea omfg.. :blobcatgiggle:

that makes it only worse

Trebach

@mazisworld @0xabad1dea The president of Unity used to be the president of EA. That should give you an impression of much of a prick he is

Oumazi Kutlwano

@trebach @0xabad1dea I cant even

Haven't played Battlefield since they fucked that up with micro transactions, and battle passes.

Fuck those people

Dwigt Rortugal 🖋

@0xabad1dea jesus christ, deception level "box propped up on a stick"

Carlos Martín Nieto

@0xabad1dea maybe they mean the repo on GitHub where you could see changes over time? I remember them getting a lot of flack for that. Removing the ToS outright seems to dumb but given everything that happened recently…

abadidea

@carlosmn I do think they mean the github repo but this is nonetheless the exact answer they gave, it was deleted for not enough views (which you’re tracking on github how, exactly? afaik you can only track stars and watches. do they… do they think that’s the same as a view count?)

Carlos Martín Nieto

@0xabad1dea if you're an admin for a repo you can go into insights and then traffic and it will show you many clones and page visits you got in the last two weeks, including referers

Carlos Martín Nieto

@0xabad1dea how many people who aren't into Growth know about this? Extremely few, apparently from posts I've seen

abadidea

@carlosmn yeah I am the admin of several repos and I was unaware, lol. though I never went intentionally looking for it

Security Writer :verified: :donor:

@0xabad1dea @grrrr_shark I’d say more subtle, but absolutely transparent, is “has been framed across the internet”.

‘Across the internet’ is a lot like a right wing tactic akin to “some say”. The word ‘framed’ is that they’re somehow the victim and people misconstrued what was said.

“A group of people, we’re too cowardly to call out (and the backlash would be massive), are deliberately twisting our words, the big meanies”.

Brad

@SecurityWriter @0xabad1dea @grrrr_shark *extremely John Lennon voice* 🎶 They call me out and out across the internet 🎵

JP

@0xabad1dea “genuinely disappointed in how it has been framed” is also one hell of a tell, I think?

It appears to be the same “how could you let me down like this” that shitty people and abusers use

Mokata Mimiru, fluffbutt.

@0xabad1dea That's the shittiest excuse that I have ever seen conjured yet.

It's a lot like saying "oh, only but a few people just only really seen my licence, so I might as well trash it, it won't be needed, right, right?"

Bollocks

Mokata Mimiru, fluffbutt.

@0xabad1dea "You know, the fire alarm hasn't even been touched, so we'll just gut the system"

Takiro 🎨

@0xabad1dea
Everyone knows the ToS needs to be the main attraction of every website.

Orange Lantern (Atari Edition)

@0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange Yes, the hot topic everyone wants to take an immediate look at on every website: The TOS.

At least they have a sense of humor.

drevil

@0xabad1dea is it just me or they never answered the question in the first place? Though given they just changed their ToS on the fly, I suppose writing any assurances down won't mean a lot to most

Rassilonian Legate

@0xabad1dea
This sounds like the kind of excuse ChatGPT would give...

abadidea

@mcc my partner is a lawyer and he says when someone has done something they know is absolutely beyond shady they say “your honor, actually what happened is I am just very, very stupid”

Wanja

@0xabad1dea @mcc Your honor let the record show that I'm a silly goofball. Just an absolute airhead.

Richard Johnson

@0xabad1dea @gsuberland

LOL. That excuse almost plays, because we can with a stretch think that an "engagement" process run amok might be allowed to remove fundamental required contractual and legal documents. But... nah

CauseOfBSOD :fediverse:

@0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange they deleted their ToS because not enough people viewed it?

this says a lot about the modern internet.

duk

@0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange so now the question is whether this entire thing was a classic "start off with a hilariously predatory idea so that the 'backtrack' would be more palatable" schtick or whether upper management genuinely completely forgot who makes unity money in the first place

the latter seems to happen pretty often across the board (ha), so..

crumbcake

@0xabad1dea An elementary school student could have come up with a better lie than that.

MagiWasTaken

@0xabad1dea Unity's CEOs and other bigwigs probably also only sold their stocks a week before the announcement because people didn't check them out enough. lol

abadidea

@magiwastaken from what I’ve heard, they were doing small sales on a regularly recurring basis. if that’s the case then they did not do anything wrong on this specific point (only all the others), it’s only insider trading if you do some big sale you otherwise weren’t planning on

MagiWasTaken

@0xabad1dea Oh, gotcha. From what I've heard it's still getting investigated since the timing is quite suspicious with how many sales there were a week before the announcement.

But yeah, I'm fine surrendering on that point. The other stuff is bad enough, as it stands, haha.

Go Up