unity’s own explanation for deleting the ToS off their own website is… it wasn’t generating enough engagement
unity’s own explanation for deleting the ToS off their own website is… it wasn’t generating enough engagement 59 comments
@0xabad1dea you know when my drivers license just wasnt going viral enough i said, why does this even take up space in my wallet? only like two cops have wanted to see it ever? i shredded it. @0xabad1dea Holy shit it's like they're operated by a robot and there's no one with a brain capable of stopping it…
@0xabad1dea you know, it's been about a decade since anyone saw the waterpipes in this house, so I think it's time to rip them all out
@0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange Maybe they were working on it, but a dog ate their homework? /s @0xabad1dea We removed the fire extinguisher from the kitchen because it just wasn't being used very often @0xabad1dea did...did they ask an LLM to write this reply for them I have no earthly idea why someone would provide that justification otherwise @0xabad1dea what truly boggles our mind is that some PR person, who somehow sleeps at night, presumably got the heads up that they were deleting the ToS in time to write a reactive comms document instructing the social media people to say that and managed to do so with a straight face. @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange make your tos interesting. add a small pong game or something. @mazisworld @0xabad1dea The president of Unity used to be the president of EA. That should give you an impression of much of a prick he is @trebach @0xabad1dea I cant even Haven't played Battlefield since they fucked that up with micro transactions, and battle passes. Fuck those people @0xabad1dea maybe they mean the repo on GitHub where you could see changes over time? I remember them getting a lot of flack for that. Removing the ToS outright seems to dumb but given everything that happened recently… @0xabad1dea if you're an admin for a repo you can go into insights and then traffic and it will show you many clones and page visits you got in the last two weeks, including referers @0xabad1dea how many people who aren't into Growth know about this? Extremely few, apparently from posts I've seen @0xabad1dea @grrrr_shark I’d say more subtle, but absolutely transparent, is “has been framed across the internet”. ‘Across the internet’ is a lot like a right wing tactic akin to “some say”. The word ‘framed’ is that they’re somehow the victim and people misconstrued what was said. “A group of people, we’re too cowardly to call out (and the backlash would be massive), are deliberately twisting our words, the big meanies”. @SecurityWriter @0xabad1dea @grrrr_shark *extremely John Lennon voice* 🎶 They call me out and out across the internet 🎵 @0xabad1dea “genuinely disappointed in how it has been framed” is also one hell of a tell, I think? It appears to be the same “how could you let me down like this” that shitty people and abusers use @0xabad1dea That's the shittiest excuse that I have ever seen conjured yet. It's a lot like saying "oh, only but a few people just only really seen my licence, so I might as well trash it, it won't be needed, right, right?" Bollocks @0xabad1dea "You know, the fire alarm hasn't even been touched, so we'll just gut the system" @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange Yes, the hot topic everyone wants to take an immediate look at on every website: The TOS. @0xabad1dea is it just me or they never answered the question in the first place? Though given they just changed their ToS on the fly, I suppose writing any assurances down won't mean a lot to most @0xabad1dea @mcc Your honor let the record show that I'm a silly goofball. Just an absolute airhead. LOL. That excuse almost plays, because we can with a stretch think that an "engagement" process run amok might be allowed to remove fundamental required contractual and legal documents. But... nah @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange they deleted their ToS because not enough people viewed it? @0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange so now the question is whether this entire thing was a classic "start off with a hilariously predatory idea so that the 'backtrack' would be more palatable" schtick or whether upper management genuinely completely forgot who makes unity money in the first place @0xabad1dea Unity's CEOs and other bigwigs probably also only sold their stocks a week before the announcement because people didn't check them out enough. lol @magiwastaken from what I’ve heard, they were doing small sales on a regularly recurring basis. if that’s the case then they did not do anything wrong on this specific point (only all the others), it’s only insider trading if you do some big sale you otherwise weren’t planning on @0xabad1dea Oh, gotcha. From what I've heard it's still getting investigated since the timing is quite suspicious with how many sales there were a week before the announcement. But yeah, I'm fine surrendering on that point. The other stuff is bad enough, as it stands, haha. |
@0xabad1dea pretty sure that's not how the law works even in the US