If you read the Sunday/Monday posts by Nik Clayton, please read ours also.
I want to be clear both I, and the project, have no desire to escalate any conflict with Nik. In the interest of that, we tried to stick to the facts and left out almost all of our own emotions about the subject (I've got some!), as well as trying to omit anything that could be construed as a counter-accusation.
Our goal is to prevent any inaccurate narratives from circulating. We do feel Nik's post contained some.
The context, from my own perspective: Tusky is currently run by a consensus process of all contributors, not any one person. I participate in that process as the organizer/moderator of our bimonthly contributor meeting.
For the record, I have never been involved in our financial side of Tusky, nor received money from the project. I was involved in the post-Nik investigation and I feature in (and wrote parts of) the OpenCollective post, and I stand behind everything in that post.