@CrimethInc You write:

"Rather than debating COVID-19 safety protocol, some would discuss how to create artificial scarcity in access to medical treatment as a means of increasing profits while others studied how to use lockdowns as a pretext to crush dissent."

It is really quite simple. If you do not want to debate COVID-19 safety protocol you exclude many people from attending and are therefore an ableist, and can therefore not claim to be an anarchist.

And here's the solution, it's just as simple: You can debate COVID-19 protocols to find an inclusive consensus that allows disabled and chronically ill people to attend. AND at the very same time you can debate how the state misused lockdowns to crush disent and how scarcity in medical supplies made certain parts of industry filthy rich.

This is NOT mutually exclusive.

But having no COVID-19 protocol excludes people from attending.