Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Sheril Kirshenbaum

In the U.S., recent annual estimates of bird deaths due to:

Cats = 2.4 billion bird deaths

Collisions from building glass = 600 million bird deaths

Land wind turbines = <200,000 bird deaths

Some politicians claim wind turbines “kill all the birds.”

But… they’re not really worried about birds. Rather, they prefer we stick with oil & gas over renewable #energy.

statista.com/chart/amp/15195/w #climatechange

58 comments
Richard

@Sheril I have to say, I had no idea cats were so deadly.

~ashwinvis

@rjt
Cats are the top predator in your backyard. True fact.
@Sheril

nick

@ashwinvis @rjt @Sheril Cats are usually top predator in whatever ecosystem they’re a part of. Tigers, Lions, Jaguars, (Mountain cats/Pumas) etc. They are incredible animals.

Juleselt

@nicktron @ashwinvis @rjt @Sheril I know I'm coming across as nit picking...and I get the irony of that, however; domestic cats sit halfway on the predator list (food chain). They're small and other predators predate on them. It's a unique position for them and one I wish more people understood as it explains a lot of domestic cat behaviors.

They shouldn't be allowed to roam. More cats die alone outside than "survive".

A.Stringer

@rjt @Sheril I'm quite surprised that cats kill more birds than tall buildings. But when I looked up building related deaths the estimate was up to 1billion, so quite a broad range. Given how many people have housecats in the US, how are they killing all these birds? Does the US have poor animal welfare. So cats aren't neutered, run feral & breed (the UK has the RSPCA for example)? The windfarms point def rings true though.Those quoting bird related deaths dont really give a f**k about birds.1/2

A.Stringer

@rjt @Sheril got curious as to what % of the bird population is actually killed by windfarms as this would provide a more comparible figure to other causes of death (namely man made climate change which causes far more bird deaths than windfarms)
energymonitor.ai/tech/renewabl

2/2

#climatechange #renewableenergy
#windfarms

@rjt @Sheril got curious as to what % of the bird population is actually killed by windfarms as this would provide a more comparible figure to other causes of death (namely man made climate change which causes far more bird deaths than windfarms)
energymonitor.ai/tech/renewabl

Writers of Wrongs

@Sheril
Clearly true.
(And I believe they're soft on cats.)

GeriAQuin

@Sheril wind turbines aren’t … agreed! But your assessment on # of cats killing birds is exteremly over blown.

Sheril Kirshenbaum

@GeriAQuin it’s not my assessment, it’s US Fish & Wildlife data (see link)

Marc

@Sheril @GeriAQuin Thank you for providing the link to this dubious USFWS report. They admit the flaws in their report:
"Many additional human-caused threats to birds, both direct (causing immediate injury/death) and indirect (causing delayed negative effects to health or productivity) are not on this list because the extent of their impact is either not currently well researched or easily quantified. For instance, habitat loss is thought to pose by far the greatest threat to birds, both directly and indirectly, however, its overall impact on bird populations is very difficult to directly assess."

@Sheril @GeriAQuin Thank you for providing the link to this dubious USFWS report. They admit the flaws in their report:
"Many additional human-caused threats to birds, both direct (causing immediate injury/death) and indirect (causing delayed negative effects to health or productivity) are not on this list because the extent of their impact is either not currently well researched or easily quantified. For instance, habitat loss is thought to pose by far the greatest threat to birds, both directly...

Ariaflame

@Sheril Also cars. Cars also kill a lot. And mobile phone towers.

Rachel Greenham

@Sheril @lisamelton even then this is only counting deaths by direct physical cause. The amount bird populations have dropped due to habitat loss and failed nests due to intensive farming and fishing destroying nest sites and decimating their prey, probably dwarfs even the toll from cats (who are mostly an urban phenomenon) and is the background that makes these other causes significant at all.

Ed Davies

@StrangeNoises Particulate pollution from burning stuff can't help birds, either. I know nothing but imagine their lungs are pretty finely tuned by evolution in terms of optimising power/weight ratio, etc, so anything gumming them up is likely to have a disproportionate effect, more so than for ground animals where weight isn't quite so critical.

@Sheril @lisamelton

Barbara Monaco

@StrangeNoises @Sheril @lisamelton Ornithologists agree. US has lost 3 billion birds in the last half century. Cornell University says that our bird population has fallen by 30% since 1970.
Cats and tall buildings and windmills have played a part, but ecological changes are the biggest culprit.

Norman Wilson

@Barbramon1 @StrangeNoises @Sheril @lisamelton
Top of this thread says cats kill 2.4 billion birds a year.
Your post says we've lost 3 billion in 50 years.
This seems inconsistent. Which is true?

Rachel Greenham

@oclsc @Barbramon1 @Sheril @lisamelton they can't both be right can they? I suspect the latter is a vast underestimate, but i also look askance at the former, frankly. Here in the UK naturalists are talking about many species having lost more like 90% (ninety percent) of their numbers over a few decades. And they squarely blame intensive farming, and the other thing we don't talk enough about, the absolute insect apocalypse that's going on.

Rachel Greenham

@oclsc @Barbramon1 @Sheril @lisamelton i mean, we tend to notice the loss of insect life only in positive terms; how our cars aren't plastered with their bodies along the front after a long journey, fewer flies invading the house this summer, that sort of thing. But it's a vast disaster, and the birds are - very nearly literally - the canaries in that coalmine.

Rachel Greenham

@oclsc @Barbramon1 @Sheril @lisamelton also to be remembered: Shifting Baseline Syndrome: Every generation (in the last century or two) has witnessed a decline, but we think of how nature was when we were growing up to be normal, and the written accounts of its huge, vast, abundance say a couple of hundred years ago barely seem credible.

Rachel Greenham

@oclsc @Barbramon1 @Sheril @lisamelton cats hunting birds in suburban gardens would be a rounding error if it wasn't for the wider environmental holocaust going on. they can be killing that many more birds than windfarms and still be a scapegoat to distract you from the real problem.

Rhombus Ticks

@Sheril

If a conservative is speaking a conservative is lying

Troll

@Sheril It’s time we deal with the real problem.

:blahaj: Why Not Zoidberg? 🦑

@Sheril apparently you can also lower the number a lot if you paint the blades. I think the idea was that painting one blade red and the rest white would make birds realize there were a solid object to avoid.

crowdotblack

@Sheril
I’m going to have to see this data. I did post construction mortality surveys at a 5 turbine site and we had 23 strikes in a year. Extrapolate that at a fraction of 23 per year and 200k doesn’t seem probable.

Matt Johnson

@Sheril it’s clear, we need to get rid of the cats 🥸

Trish Murphy

@Sheril And that first number is just the cats from my neighborhood.

Leo Ré Jorge

@Sheril great summary. I'm always mesmerized by the fact that even within the academic community in ecology and ornithology, people who don't study this issue directly keep repeating this fallacy planted by the fossil fuel interests

Sheril Kirshenbaum

Popping on the visualization (also linked above) bc there were a few questions about the data.

This chart displays the US Fish & Wildlife estimates of annual bird mortality in the U.S. from several human causes. /2

Svend Waldorff

@Sheril while agreeing with the basic premise (wind turbines kill a suprisinglow number of birds) I do wonder if we are ignoring the "quality" when we just look at the quantity. I would imagine that cats mainly catch small, very common birds (sparrows, etc) while the wind turbines may kill a larger proportion of the bigger and more endagered species (birds of prey and the like).
Would be nice if there are numbers to back me up or prove me wrong.

Svend Waldorff

@Nonya_Bidniss @Sheril
Some interesting solution proposals:
Make the rubines more visible to birds:
euronews.com/green/2023/03/01/
Or swiutch them off when a (big, valuable) bird approaches (either detecting the transponder endagered specias carry or using a radar+AI system)
audubon.org/magazine/spring-20

Bob Tregilus 🐧 📷

@Sheril Yup, and "Audubon strongly supports wind energy that is sited and operated properly to avoid, minimize, and mitigate effectively for the impacts on birds, other wildlife, and the places they need now and in the future. To that end, we support the development of wind energy to achieve 100% clean electricity." audubon.org/news/wind-power-an

Also, awhile ago, Benjamin Sovacool did a lot of work contextualizing bird kills per GWh generated across various technologies. grist.org/wp-content/uploads/2

@Sheril Yup, and "Audubon strongly supports wind energy that is sited and operated properly to avoid, minimize, and mitigate effectively for the impacts on birds, other wildlife, and the places they need now and in the future. To that end, we support the development of wind energy to achieve 100% clean electricity." audubon.org/news/wind-power-an

Darrin West

@Sheril This would be more readable if shown in millions. 2,400 vs 0.23 instead of uncountable zeros.

BlinkPopShift👁️🫧⤴️

@Sheril So frustrating that a meta analysis from a decade ago that was mostly guess work and approximation is still being sited as an accurate rate of cat caused bird deaths. They even state in the appendix that while most bird deaths are attributed to feral cats "no empirically driven estimate of un-owned cat abundance exists for the contiguous U.S."

Here is a break down of why the data is essentially intentional misinformation from the NIH

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/

Pierric

@BlinkPopShift @Sheril thanks for sharing, this is interesting and relevant.
I'd just add that the original argument that wind turbines are not the worst, most evil bird killer ever, probably still holds given the orders of magnitude.
Also the review states that pressure from cats is not a problem if populations remain sustainable, which is valid in theory; but we know that bird populations are in fact dropping fast in most places, so any pressure that can be avoided ideally should be.

Sunny 🟦

@Sheril
No wonder birds are so skittish!

Honestly? I've seen half a dozen birds killed by hawks at my bird feeder so far this year, and I've only seen one cat take a run at them, and he missed!

Now how about a fact-check on the BS being spread by the liars at Republican HQ, about windmills and #birds.

factcheck.afp.com/bird-deaths-

ludiusvox

@Sheril yes bit wind turbines is killing big birds such as eagles and condors, a cat cannot harm an eagle. Eagles are really common up north where solar power doesn't work and they want to use huge wind turbines that are ugly.

ludiusvox

@simSalabim @Sheril

Oh I been protesting this in outer-banks right next to the wildlife sanctuary in North Carolina, the election swing a win or loss by 10,000 votes and they approve these horrible projects with slim margins.

Number6

@Sheril Humans have removed most predators from our landscapes allowing small birds to flourish in a way they would not naturally be able. Despite the cat predation, we don't see any small birds in danger of extinction.

Cats pose no danger for condors, and condors are unlikely to be flying into glass buildings. So we would want to know what kind of birds are flying into the wind turbines. If condors ... that's a problem. If seagulls ... not so much.

Oggie

@Sheril
The thing is (and I'm not going to even attempt to engage with the numbers as a lot of replies are, since I don't have the backing), it's never been about the 'reality', just the perception.

Saying 'This kills birds', they're hoping for a visceral emotional reaction, like when it was discovered that 'cute baby seal in oil' got a stronger reaction than 'billions of animals dead'.

Of course, I -personally- hate birds viscerally, but I support keeping them alive. Away from me.

@Sheril
The thing is (and I'm not going to even attempt to engage with the numbers as a lot of replies are, since I don't have the backing), it's never been about the 'reality', just the perception.

Saying 'This kills birds', they're hoping for a visceral emotional reaction, like when it was discovered that 'cute baby seal in oil' got a stronger reaction than 'billions of animals dead'.

HonestHypocrite

@Sheril I made this chart in 2019 and included error bars where available to help with some questions.

from 10/08/2019 and this tweet twitter.com/honesthypocrite/st

#Bird #deaths annually by hazard. #Cats kill 10,000 times more birds than #wind #turbines. Even oil pits (!) kill three times as many. Improved visualization inspired by @1a story today using @Tableau and data from fws.gov/library/collections/th

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧*:・゚✧

@Sheril Wind is way better than coal or oil, but still has issues like how much land it uses and how it disrupts local wildlife. Nuclear supplemented with solar is the ONLY future.

Darren

@Sheril I see US Fish and Wildlife left off humans (hunters) from their chart.

Jake in the desert

@Sheril I have two cats and I believe these numbers

selmins

@Sheril while I agree with your main point, I find these statistics lack qualitative information on which kinds of birds. For instance I don't think cats can kill eagles, but wind turbines may.

Chumchum Tumtum

@Sheril without even getting into the deaths due to the habitat destruction caused by the fossil fuel industry

kapowaz

@Sheril there’s a great chapter on cats and their role in bird deaths in The World Without Us, by Alan Weisman. Simply put, they’re remorseless killing machines, who hunt for the fun of it.

Speckdäne

@Sheril The same lies here in #Germany. No windmills back in the 70ies, when I started with #birding as hobby. Three breeding pairs of #WhiteTailedEagle in the state of #SchleswigHolstein, where I lived. Now more than 120 pairs. The same with other large birds, #Osprey, #RedKite, #BlackKite, #Spoonbill, #WhiteStork, #GreyHeron well increasing. #GreatEgret and #LittleEgret as new breeding species. The same tendency in #Denmark. Lots of large windmills now, great birds increasing.

Nicole Parsons

@Sheril

When does "retaining captive consumer markets" become just slavery?

Steve Kershaw

@Sheril Very interesting. I suspect the causes may differ by country - even so, I'm surprised changes in agriculture is not in the list here for the US as, here in the UK, it's by far the biggest reason. Perhaps, it's due to the sheer size of the US (unless they made a mistake).
Here, we got rid of hedgerows and killed all the insects off so there's no food other than in the towns and cities. I think it also explains why so many big birds like crows, magpies and pigeons have come into the city

Steve Kershaw

@Sheril ...which also makes things more difficult for smaller garden birds now as they have to compete with ever increasing numbers of big birds to eat. rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife

Go Up