Poll: If #Threads goes ahead with its plan to add #ActivityPub, will you follow one or more Threads users in your Mastodon account?
Poll
Voting ended 17 Jul 2023 at 10:08.
Poll: If #Threads goes ahead with its plan to add #ActivityPub, will you follow one or more Threads users in your Mastodon account? Anonymous poll
Poll
Heck Yeah!
2,224
57.2%
Hell No!
1,294
33.3%
Other (please comment)
3,889 people voted. 371
9.5%
Voting ended 17 Jul 2023 at 10:08. 59 comments
There are some people I follow (and some I am mutuals with) that are on Twitter & Instagram – who aren't on (the non-Threads part of) the Fediverse, but are now on Threads. Them being on Threads not only enables me to bring over that relationship to the Fediverse, but — It may make it so I do not have to go over those (non-Fediverse) platforms (as much, if not at all). @ricmac @mitexleo @ricmac @ricmac I am hoping this blows up in Meta's face and becomes a gateway drug to the #fediverse for the normies. The UX in Threads is very primitive and people looking for a better experience (or, ya know, a web interface) can easily find better options on the #Mastodon side. @ricmac Still waiting for the governing body of my server to decide if they'll federate. It's an otherwise nice community with good safeguards I really appreciate, and I would be loath to move. If they block #Threads, I won't move. If we federate with #Threads, it really depends on how many other communities then block us. There's essentially no UX for that, you'll just silently lose follows/followers. I guess if enough servers allow Threads, *then* I'll potentially follow accounts there. @wimletzer I have just the article for you -> https://thenewstack.io/threads-adopting-activitypub-makes-sense-but-wont-be-easy/ If my instance even federated with a Threads server, I'd have to move. Luckily, my instance would never do that. @ricmac @ricmac Yes why not, if there is interesting accounts. But not in a « heck yeah » mode 😅 @ricmac honestly don't know, if it becomes the cluster fuck of spam that IG is I'm defederating them really quickly. Regardless if someone I might want to follow is on it @ricmac I might, but only if it's a person who seems to actually have things to say that I find worthwhile to read. I want the idea of a larger Fediverse to happen, but I don't want it to be some inorganic corporate bile firehose either. @ricmac This is simple. I'd like to see what my Mum's doing without having to wade into the cesspool that is Facebook. @ricmac My answer is I don't know because it's too soon to know if there is anything about Threads worth following. @ricmac I think it really depends on the extent to which the organizations I want to follow move to Mastodon. I’ve never really loved Twitter because of the algorithms, and Mastodon is much better for that, but there are a lot of friends and companies that haven’t moved across yet. Reposting bots have helped, but then you can’t really participate in the conversation fully. Looks like Threads is wildly popular already, and might prevent some organizations moving, so I’ll follow them from here. @ricmac I might try a "separation of church and state" approach, add an account on another instance and just follow Threads people there. Lesson learned from throwaway email accounts. @ricmac depends does threads then have access permission to my entire cell phone. If so, no @ricmac @ricmac Absolutely. So many of the communities I followed on Twitter outside of Tech aren’t present or are too small here. Already found that some of those are better represented on Threads after a week. I absolutely don’t want to have to use a threads account but there are lots of people that I want to follow that will probably only be on Threads. I lean towards "no". But I think the issue is a bit more complex than just yes/no. I do understand why there are people who are for federating with Threads or other commercial networks, as it can be a good way of showing non-tech people how something like the fediverse works, which might (in time) make it the norm. On the other hand, it could easily backfire, as previous attempts of merging FOSS and commercial communication media (XMPP being the prime example) have demonstrated. @ricmac wish i could but my instance admins decided to block it preemptively. so i guess i’ll just miss out on that entire segment of the social web. Sure if they must be on Threads I can follow them from here if the interoperability ever materializes, some folks laid off at Twitter may have the skills to build it for Meta. @ricmac Depends on the person. If someone provides interesting content, sure. But I'm not as likely to follow someone who is only on threads, unless it's some of the Instagram people I already follow with craft or cooking accounts. (I no longer post on Instagram, I just follow magazine like accounts and a handful of younger generation friends/family who weren't on Twitter ever. I don't think they're on FB, but I dumped FB over a decade+ ago, so can't say for sure.) @ricmac I have friends (even some who are very into tech) who haven’t joined Mastodon because their eyes glaze over when I start talking about instances, federation, etc. but they’re on Threads because it’s easy. Soon we’ll be able to follow each other. I find it puzzling why so many Mastodon users are against this and want to preemptively defederate. |
@ricmac maybe