Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Felix Urbasik

@jon It still bothers me that @matrix did not adopt this scheme.

17 comments
Luna :circleA:

@fell @jon Hot take but I like how Matrix uses colons, it distinguishes the types of software at a glance, so you never have to specify which one is the chat app and which one is the social media

irina 🌷🐇

@luna i like "/", because its like "on" if you say ⅞ as "7 on 8". @user/example.site

but the ship has totally sailed so it'll probably be @...@... forever

Luna :circleA:

@irina Considering the colon is sometimes used as a division symbol, that may be what Matrix was going for?

kinyutaka

@irina @luna

I always think of the fraction as "over", like "7 over 8"

But there was a bunch of hacking attacks that used / as a way to get information.

Brittany Wilson

@irina @luna This looks much better than the two ampersands though. The two ampersands looks really bad and that’s been hard for me to get past!!

hauleth 🇵🇱❤️🇺🇦

@irina @luna `@` is `at`, so it is `user at example.site`. IMHO the `@` at the beginning is more problematic.

Andrew

@irina @luna the other problem with / is that it's precisely opposite to how / is used in URLs — as in example.site/user

Anyarchiste 😸

@luna @fell @jon I like the colons more because it differentiates between pseudonym and server name

The Matrix.org Foundation

@fell @jon I /think/ that @user@domain wasn't a thing when we created Matrix in 2014. the double at looks ugly; colon is prettier :P

Felix Urbasik

@matrix @jon That's what I call an official answer! Fair enough, a lot of people seem to pefer the colon.

The Matrix.org Foundation

@fell @jon the best thing is you can pronounce it "at matthew colon matrix.org" and then abbreviate 'colon' to 'on', so it becomes "at matthew on matrix.org". Whereas "at matthew at matrix.org" just sounds confusing ;P

Felix Urbasik

@matrix @jon I mean, in my opinion "matthew at matrix.org" like #XMPP would've been perfectly fine. But whatever works.

jabberati

@fell @matrix @jon The same guys who unnecessarily reinvent XMPP also unnecessarily reinvent URIs? No way!

hubzillar
@Matrix.org
Semantics from matriix.
The client software is s...
Poor functionality on web browsers, no compliance with accessibility standards, gratuiious ecmascript. Do not ask people in bandwidth expensive places to download s... 50, 100, etc. software (sorry, b... "apps"). Make your service work on basic web browsers.

End of rant.
@Matrix.org
Semantics from matriix.
The client software is s...
Poor functionality on web browsers, no compliance with accessibility standards, gratuiious ecmascript. Do not ask people in bandwidth expensive places to download s... 50, 100, etc. software (sorry, b... "apps"). Make your service work on basic web browsers.
Râu Cao ⚡

@matrix @fell @jon The double @ is superfluous. You can use normal user@domain addresses on fedi, too.

The idea that those didn't exist in 2014 is ludicrous. E-Mail being the obvious example. XMPP another one.

Tobskep
@matrix @fell @jon true, i wonder why they don't just use @user:domain like everyone else
Go Up