Have you ever edited #Wikipedia? :blobhaj_thinking:
(Boost for some reach? 🥺)
Poll
Voting ended 13 Jul 2023 at 10:18.
Have you ever edited #Wikipedia? :blobhaj_thinking: (Boost for some reach? 🥺) Anonymous poll
Poll
Yes I have
3,194
59.5%
No I haven't
5,369 people voted. 2,175
40.5%
Voting ended 13 Jul 2023 at 10:18. 157 comments
@MiaWinter god that sort of topic often descends into edit warring over the silliest stuff.. 🥴 @efi @theresnotime well, if you like iseka anime (or to be presicely, parodies of such) and don't mind a little fanservice (par for the course when making fun of isekai) konosuba is really fun, and the person it talked about is the villain in the movie, so there is one scene that can be seen a bit transphobic, but it's bc the main character is an asshole and it's just used as another scene to make him look like an asshole, since every single other person is never transphobic to her @theresnotime also wiki confessions i once got an entire sub block for my isp banned from editing because when i was little my sisters pestered me with soy luna or miraculous (dont remember) and i got mad and attempted multiple times to nuke the wiki page, got around the ban by power cycling the router @theresnotime The only edits I really made were correcting some chemical formulae on wiki pages of minerals. Sometimes I feel like I should get more involved in editing Wikipedia, though. @kalikiana oh that's interesting! Logged out edits still make up a good percentage of total edits afaik! :3 @theresnotime@wikis.world My one Wikipedia claim to fame is editing a small error in the address calculation of an instruction for an obscure CPU @theresnotime it took me a bit of time to realize that "edit" means more than just "fix typos and obvious incorrect/outdated information". I've had it similarly with open source, but it took me less time. but yeah, realizing that even stuff like "this language version does not indicate she's a corrupt [redacted]" is something I *can* and even *should* fix *myself*, kinda blew my mind @selfisekai I'd personally say fixing typos and obvious incorrect information is as much "editing" as anything else :3 @theresnotime Someone was *wrong* on the internet. I had to issue a correction :blobcatTriumph: @freya (inb4 that's all Wikipedia editors are... people who like to correct folx on the internet 😅) @theresnotime Only to fix obvious minor grammar errors/typos, I don't have an account 🙈 @theresnotime I'm not ashamed to say I had a ton of edits in Animal Planet's Wikipedia page to correct and add show information 😳🤭 @theresnotime I think I edited about two words into an article once, they probably got edited back within minutes. @theresnotime I have a feeling it got edited back and I changed it again because I knew I was right. So long ago now, can't remember what so can't go and check on it! @theresnotime I added a bit of pop culture trivia about a godawful place, that no one does or should ever care about. And now you've just reminded me there's another article that I need to amend. @theresnotime I'm trying, but the damn thing's blocking my IP address! And this is even after I killed the VPN. 😕 It's 4 am here, so I think I'll try again after I'm actually awake. @DukeDuke good idea, get some sleep! :p but let me know if you're still having issues, we might be able to assign you "IP Block Exemption" (https://w.wiki/J6b) @theresnotime @theresnotime Yes, but they almost always got reverted to something incorrect by someone who was guarding "their" entry, so I stopped. @HauntedOwlbear urgh, that's annoying to hear, I'm sorry :/ could always be worth trying again some time (and letting me know if it happens!) @theresnotime thanks! I'll serious consider it. It was a while ago that I last tried. @theresnotime yes but any edits got yeeted by a Swiss "Men's Rights Activist" including appeals and discussion of the edits. Never bothered since then... @theresnotime WK Editor reproached me for adding a link to my (free) software. They removed my edit. But in the links, they had no problem leaving a link to a commercial company who sells online training. That was a slap in the face for me. ( ⬇️ ) So: Errr... of course it's my website. This is were I publish my projects. (PS: There are ZERO ads on my website. and I sell nothing.) Basically, they didn't even CHECK if the added information was relevant to the topic. They saw that the URL was ressembling my wikipedia pseudo, so they just blocked everything from me. @sebsauvage urgh :/ there's a fine line on (potential/perceived) "Conflict of Interest" editing (https://w.wiki/td8) and sometimes folx push back harder than they should.. in this case, I'm not sure, but having a conversation with someone and figuring things out (even if the outcome was similar) costs us nothing in civility.. @theresnotime This makes me wonder how much information gets pushed back just because editors don't even CHECK if the information is revelant (which... well.. should be the main concern). (And how many good wills totally abandon Wikipedia edition because of this.) @theresnotime And it always has been reverted by someone who took ownership of the article and doesn't allow any change whatsoever. @theresnotime And @openstreetmap as well! :) @theresnotime@wikis.world @theresnotime not directly (feels like I need to know a lot of rules and stuff beforehand 😕), but a Wikipedia editor once added a redirect based on info I said, it was from "Valley of the Whales" to "Wadi El Hitan", a translation of a very unique archeological site in Egypt 😊 @autistic_enby the tutorial (https://w.wiki/33N) has got a lot better recently, so the "really important" policies are fairly straightforward to get the gist of.. maybe time to give it a go..! :3 @theresnotime Tried but it was deleted because I updated the amount of employees according to the last official business report of the company I worked at and posted from a IP at this company. Therefore nobody trusted me telling the truth. @streetcoder ahh darn, yeah conflicts of interest (https://w.wiki/td8) are taken fairly seriously — you could always try an edit request (https://w.wiki/4mmm) for someone to do on your behalf ^^ Follow-up poll for those who have edited Wikipedia — was it a one-off thing, or do you edit semi-regularly still? (let's define semi-regularly as 1+ edits a month) @theresnotime And a final follow-up poll in this thread, for anyone who responded — would folx be interested in filling out a larger (anonymous & privacy-conscious) survey on their experiences? [nb. I am doing this as a personal/volunteer thing, this ain't work, I don't bring work on fedi, but I will explicitly note that I work for the WMF] @theresnotime I fixed the JAMMA article that said it was wired up for two buttons per joystick (it's actually three). It got reverted. ㄟ(ツ)ㄏ @theresnotime I have an account, but I do it anonymously when they will let me. Otherwise you're dragged into "the community" which I think is inspired by Terry Gilliam's film Brazil. Usually I'm just fixing grammar or removing vandalism, though, but sometimes work-related stuff that I'm confident is wrong or I have a good additional reference for. @theresnotime I sporadically edit, usually in flurries as I rabbithole my way through a particular topic. So I went with once or twice @theresnotime@wikis.world I want to contribute. But I feel like there isn't that much I could add. 😅 @theresnotime I updated/corrected information related to software I worked on, for which I wrote a ~600 page manual, to have the changes consistently reverted by a couple people who really wanted to have the world's most boring ideological debate, and I suspect had never engaged legal advise related to how Intellectual Property works. @whitemice yet another of those topic areas which end up having the most silly debates 🙃 @theresnotime yeah, I used to procrastinate in undergrad by doing major projects on articles about the Bahá’í Faith and Shia Islam, two interests of mine. @theresnotime this toot is a good reminder that I really enjoy the process, I oughta get back into it. It’s be a good activity to work on during downtime at work when I’m expected to staff a library service desk, but don’t have a project to work on while waiting for people to need my help. @yerald you absolutely should get back into it if you can! https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM has some specific stuff on libraries too... @theresnotime I’ve thought about doing some work on library science pages, but the basics are in such disarray currently it’s hard to know where to start. There’s just a ton of redundant pages for the same basic things. Hmm, where to get back into editing… @theresnotime yes, most of the time to fix a typo or a wording or to add some missing sources to existing text. @theresnotime I actually wrote an article, 20 years ago. They had next to no content. It got ‘improved’ so much much over the following couple of years, as the terminally online professional internetters took over, I swore never to contribute again . And I haven’t . @doublejay isn't the point to have your article(s) expanded on and improved? (or were these "improvements"..?) :blobhaj_thinking: @theresnotime Easiest poll answer ever! Nearly 20 year veteran with over 10 000 edits. @theresnotime I sure have once, some nuances that I know as fact through my work. @theresnotime @theresnotime Yes, but kinda gave up once the deletionists started blowing away genuinely useful articles that I had contributed to. @theresnotime I reallly should make an account. There's an error on the page on Theory X, theorized by Parfit. It's such a tiny area that it doesn't matter, but it bugs me as I did my Masters on the subject. @theresnotime No, and sadly, the reason I haven't is that the people I know personally who have done a lot of Wikipedia editing were super-pedantic knobs about it. NOT saying this is true of everyone who contributes, but it made me very much not want to get involved. @theresnotime wrote some articles in the very beginning but they have all been deleted within some minutes because they were not relevant. So I never tried again and even avoid to link to wikipedia 🤷♀️ @theresnotime I added the rust hello world example to my language's Hello World wikipedia page @theresnotime I have. But after some silly edit wars I won't do it any more. There are better ways to spend time and spread knowledge. @theresnotime Have tried a few times, but Wikipedia really does not want me to have edited it so the changes keep getting reverted. Nothing malicious, just them trying not to have up-to-date info on recently happened things (like Queen Elizabeth dying etc). @theresnotime no way, I do not edit Wikipedia. I tried a couple times long ago but there was a degree of specialty process and etiquette I didn't understand which made me feel like I was getting in trouble or doing something wrong. I'm not smart enough to make edits important enough to learn all the processes and be a part of the community in a meaningful way, so I just don't touch the edit button @theresnotime Just to be clear, it was MY #Wikipedia page that I edited. @theresnotime I edited intensively for around 10 years, then stopped (don't know how to fit that into your second poll 🙂 ). Happy to tell you more if needed. @theresnotime, I rewrote and added historical material to the wiki for the small town where I was born. living up to my screen name, I normally block anyone who asks boost for reach, as it seems obnoxious but anyway esp annoying are the math article intros which are almost never written at a level correct for a general encylopedia, but are written for a college math graduate @theresnotime@wikis.world Several times. Nothing big, but a new paragraph or two or updating older info with newer variants. Diese zweigestreifte Quelljungfer musste nach der Eiablage erst mal abhängen und chillen. #Libelle #Odonata @theresnotime I added lot of info for Chess with different armies (the Ralph Betza chess variant) from my (at the time current) hyperfocus on chess variants and the website chessvariants.org @theresnotime for clarity, I edited my older brother's page for a joke. So not a grown up wiki edit. @theresnotime I tried once, but was banned for "vandalism", all just because I tried to ADD to the article from a woman's perspective. Apparently women's viewpoints are not welcome on there. @theresnotime Tend to poke at random musician pages when I find them out of date (like only listing albums as of 2005 or something like that) and also have been known to do minor grammar changes just because 🙂 @theresnotime Yes, I tried. I gave up after the umpteenth time someone insisted on including Scientology propaganda in psych articles while insisting that I knew nothing about medicine. @theresnotime I got excited about Wikidata a while back and started to contribute. Suddenly I was “globally locked”. No idea why. That was that. @theresnotime many years ago, about 15? maybe, i edited a few pages and attempted to start a page. i was met with such fierce, furious resistance from a cohort of established male community members that i gave up and never tried again. @theresnotime But I wont any more since the grognards who shadow run it like an 18th century Chinese Imperial Harem require learning a silo'd and narrow skill I have better things to do than learn @theresnotime I actually reverted some vandalisms whenever I found them. Not much, but everything helps. Knowing the typical fedi clientele, I am entirely unsurprised at these results 😂 FWIW, I've edited Wikipedia a grand total of once. It was an incorrect formula for something on an obscure page, I can't remember exactly. Not something to cause an edit war! @theresnotime Literally one edit, about the details about C-41 film development. On a page I'm fairly certain gets next to 0 views because it's like 5 layers deep into film development. @theresnotime got banned from editing because I edited over (read: corrected) a trusted editor's work with a non-english source about a non-english topic so that it said the same as the non-english article @theresnotime once I spoiled myself while reading the synopsis of a Ghibli film (not the English page) so I rephrased the paragraph, removing the spoiler and retaining the information. @theresnotime@wikis.world i am banned from editing wikipedia because i tried to spread misinfo @theresnotime I created two articles for a pop-punk band about their EPs and they got removed some some time later 😔 (I did find original sources and formatted then properly. IDK what happened since they had been up for a few years after I posted them) But I mostly do spelling and grammar anyway @theresnotime Does editing the page for my local representative count? He was the founder of the charter school I attended and I added some pertinent information from that time. Like when he made me clean up the local dump site behind the school. I had to clean up used cat litter. @theresnotime I greatly dislike the site. I try not to use it except as a stepping stone. It upsets me that people treat it as equal to a fact-checked reference source. But I have edited it once or twice in the last couple of decades. Not more than that, though. @theresnotime tried to once cause livonia from arma 3 contact was missing its flag in the list of fictional nations, but wound up being a bit too confused by the process and giving up
@theresnotime I did edit and even create new articles in the early days, like 15 years ago. Have stopped a long time ago though. |
@theresnotime I have corrected some entry on an lgbt list about a character that was wrongly claimed to be a femboy, although only using she/her the entire movie and all the ppl around her only refering to her as a woman, there was just one scene were it was noted that she got different parts