|
Top-level
@davidrevoy I'm wondering Currently Instagram is a closed place: if you don't have an account you can't really browse the user's content That's one thing Elon tried to do with his toy in the last few days, and users weren't happy For Threads, you need an Instagram account, but is content will be available for everyone, or just for registered users? Twitter users may will just migrate from a proprietary closed place to another one, Mastodon and Fediverse may not be really impacted by them... 8 comments
@gunchleoc @grum999 @davidrevoy You can already glance at Threads profile (even with Firefox, don't know why you said it's not working). For exemple : https://www.threads.net/@netflix Don't forget to wash your hands and your browser after ;) @brunospy @gunchleoc @davidrevoy the things is: do I really want to go on it? :ablobcateyesflip: may be curiosity will let me take a look, bu I clearly won't create an account :ablobcatcoffee:  @grum999 @brunospy @davidrevoy You need to lower the security in Firefox from "Strict" to "Standard" so that the #Threads site will work - all the better to track you with. Not gonna happen. @grum999 @brunospy @davidrevoy Don't tell me you're surprised? Tracking is their business model. 🤷 @gunchleoc @brunospy @davidrevoy Yes, by default I try to block all trackers and in this case, going to provided Threads link you just have a blank page with Threads&Meta logo They don't need me, I don't need them, I just won't change my browser's settings for something useless to me :ablobcatcoffee: |
Gregory's Server
@grum999 @davidrevoy You can currently see it with a Chromium-based browser if you have a direct link to a post. It does not work on Firefox.