6 comments
@dethos it definitely feels sus, though I could see some potentially reasonable use-cases. Like banking websites, where maybe some shifty extensions should be disabled. But this needs to be done with the consent of the user and making sure that the user is well-informed about what's going on. Clearly that is not the case. Sigh. @ariadne @rysiek @dethos first, as mentioned in the article, the ad blocker uBlock is a trusted addon, and thus not blocked by the new feature. It appears that it will only affect add-ons that aren't checked by Mozilla. Second, it's up to Mozilla which websites are protected, not up to the website owners themselves. |
@rysiek I know 🤯