Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
5 comments
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

@dethos it definitely feels sus, though I could see some potentially reasonable use-cases. Like banking websites, where maybe some shifty extensions should be disabled.

But this needs to be done with the consent of the user and making sure that the user is well-informed about what's going on. Clearly that is not the case. Sigh.

Gen X-Wing

@rysiek @dethos Could easily throw up some big warning or what not. Say “this is a bank, want to disable all extensions?”.

This feature reeks of thought crime and big brother. Not the shitty TV show, but the nineteen eighty-four kind.

Ariadne Conill 🐰

@rysiek @dethos ah yes so all the sites who want adblock to not work will declare themselves as an extension free zone

Stephan

@ariadne @rysiek @dethos first, as mentioned in the article, the ad blocker uBlock is a trusted addon, and thus not blocked by the new feature. It appears that it will only affect add-ons that aren't checked by Mozilla. Second, it's up to Mozilla which websites are protected, not up to the website owners themselves.

Gonçalo Valério

@durchaus @ariadne @rysiek regardless of the current config, what matters is the capability that the vendor is giving himself and the way it was communicated.

The list can easily change overtime to accommodate Mozilla's needs (or their "customers" needs).

Go Up