Gregory's ServerQuitting is computationally expensive.
|
34 comments
 @sycophantic βDeep thoughts with Jerry Bellβ is going to be my new podcast name  @jerry @sycophantic all yours π, it would be wild to pick someone called Ben as your co-host  That would be a clue by four if Tom from Insta came over to pixelfed. ππ¨  @Taco_lad @jerry @sycophantic Just one cohost named Ben though. If you're a deep diving Bell, you don't want the Bens. @murph this thread is sinking fast @Taco_lad @sycophantic @jerry @sycophantic Jerry: "Fish....::long pause:: swim in water....::long pause:: but do they think they actually walk?"
I'd listen to that podcast. :D @jerry Not if you take the NOP Sled If only there was a Moore with a Law or something equivalent to cite for this new fangled, since 2016, #web3 #ActivityPub Schroeder Type Cat of the #OpenWeb. Something about the doubling of... or is it Alive or Dead or something? Gosh, this just eludes me as to why this could be important! #SendPost π π¨  @jerry itβs called reverse engineering. Fewer users need more resources. Thatβs why Twitter is cutting their resources, due to the fantastic growth numbers. @haploc that makes sense. I had been wondering how the math worked on their shrinking server estate and massively growing user base.  @ccunning based on EMβs comments, I assumed it was because they crossed the 22 billion user mark  @jerry We need to put a rate-limit on all the quit-requests so that it doesn't harm those who are staying. No more than 600 quitting per day, something like that.  @Andres@mastodon.hardcoredevs.com @jerry@infosec.exchange @pre@boing.world and if you miss a payment your account gets reinstated and the fee doubled    @jerry it probably is computationally expensive when people nuke every reddit/Twitter post they've made for a decade before quitting one of those platforms |
@jerry that's deep