@pre (p2) Why is AI generated imagery not a valid tool? What makes it less important, less authentic than people literally standing behind a jet engine flinging paint onto a canvas? We are looking at the first steps towards anyone being able to share what they see in their mind to the world. If this isn't a valid form of creation, then art as a medium of visual expression needs to be redefined.
@gumwars If an advertising executive asks David to draw Pepper drinking a lovely can of cola, does that make the advertising executive an artist?
If you want to call these AI images art, then it's far to ask "who is the artist?" in that case.
I can see an argument for the artist being the people who produced all the training data, or maybe the team that built the model.
But definitely not the person who just typed a prompt.
They can maybe be the executive producer or something, but not the artist.
@gumwars If an advertising executive asks David to draw Pepper drinking a lovely can of cola, does that make the advertising executive an artist?
If you want to call these AI images art, then it's far to ask "who is the artist?" in that case.
I can see an argument for the artist being the people who produced all the training data, or maybe the team that built the model.