@lonelyowl
> SD is completely free, open source
Yes, but not Free/Libre as GPL (src https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_Diffusion#License )
> it turned out that it's forbidden.
it's not, but if you do derivation of my art, you have to keep attribution. I should get credited in this regards legally in all AI images, because my art is part of the dataset. (but I don't want, that would be a nightmare). Also, got already ethical request to train on my art https://www.davidrevoy.com/article642/scientific-paper-sketch-to-line-art-by-waseda-university and accepted 😉
@davidrevoy
> Yes, but not Free/Libre as GPL
It's similar to more permissive licenses, i don't think this is bad.
> I should get credited in this regards legally in all AI images
This is technically possible, pic related.
However, result image isn't even bareilly similar to your drawings, also model contains information about thousands of other artist's drawings, which maybe or maybe not used to produce this shitty example test image...