 Pixelfed does not display text-only posts in timelines, regardless of who we block, P92 posts won't be seen in Pixelfed feeds. Furthermore, instead of an outright ban, pixelfed.social/art will silence P92, allowing users to opt to follow P92 accounts, or use a domain block to make that choice themselves. I hope this clears up any confusion. 17 comments
  @corbin not true. Precautions include rate limiting, prohibitions on scraping in the terms of service, and machine learning to detect bot-like behavior and force captchas before consuming more content, all of which Facebook uses on its own sites. Could also block or limit Facebook-owned IP ranges. @scott @corbin Yeah, I would second this to say it really, really isn't true. Of course anyone can break the rules of any website by scraping it but there are technical ways to recognise and limit that. And it certainly doesn't mean we should just leave doors wide open and not bother making very clear that unauthorized collection of data is not an acceptable use of the service. That people can break rules doesn't mean there's no point having rules. @scott I don’t see how most of that is feasible while retaining AP interoperability, especially since FB has plenty of IPs and server power to throw around, but more power to the devs if they can make that happen @corbin @scott worth noting that AUTHORIZED_FETCH is also a thing, which (aiui) would require scraping to come from something vaguely shaped like a fedi instance, so they'd have to burn domains instead of just IPs  @dansup Speaking of which, is there any way to see what instances are banned, silenced, etc (and why) on Pixelfed? I'm not able to find or follow a few photographers on mstdn.jp, and I assume that users there who follow me on Mastodon won't see my boosts from Pixelfed.social. |
Gregory's Server
@dansup Does this mean if you follow someone (on for example Mastodon) from your Pixelfed account, you will only see their posts if they include a photo?