Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Wikipedia's posts Post Back to profile
Wikipedia

Not that anyone noticed, but the English #Wikipedia recently crossed the 6,666,666 article mark.

Unofficially, the milestone article was... SatanCon! It's the annual convention of the Satanic Temple.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SatanCon

English Wikipedia screenshot of the first revision of the "SatanCon" article This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rhododendrites (talk | contribs | block) at 13:28, 9 June 2023 (Holy cow! It's article number 6,666,666! Hail, Wikipedia! :)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision. SatanCon is the annual convention of the Satanic Temple, a non-theistic religious organization which uses Satanic imagery to advocate for egalitarianism, social justice, and the separation of church and state. The conventions combine traditional conference-style educational panels with social events, arts, and a marketplace. Background The Satanic Temple is a non-theistic religious organization founded in 2013. It uses Satanic imagery, humor, and legal tactics to advocate for the separation of church and state, critical thinking, reproductive rights, abolishing corporal punishment in schools, and other causes.[1] It does not believe in a supernatural Satan, but uses the idea of Satan and the public's reaction to the concept as a metaphorical or satirical tool to challenge religious authority and advocate against what it views as injustice.[2][3]
11 Jun 2023 at 4:12 | Open on wikis.world
37 comments
Paul Chambers

@wikipedia

You better be careful or else Republican states will ban Wikipedia. 😂

11 Jun 2023 at 4:17 | Open on oldfriends.live
DELETED

@paul @wikipedia

wikipedia represents knowledge, the enemy of GOP voters, so it could happen

11 Jun 2023 at 4:19 | Open on techhub.social
Mx. Luna Corbden

@accretionist @paul @wikipedia I’m almost certain some group or other is planning ways to destroy Wikipedia as we speak. One way that I’ve heard rumors might be starting already is the use of LLMs to spam edits in edit wars on controversial pages. I don’t take Wikipedia for granted AT ALL.

11 Jun 2023 at 4:37 | Open on defcon.social
Richard Knipel

@corbden @accretionist @paul @wikipedia Groups of every conceivable brand of bad politics have been attempting this for 20+ years. It has survived the ill-will of various governments, corporations, and other vandals thanks to the resilience of a global volunteer community that indeed does not take it for granted. Wikipedia abides.

11 Jun 2023 at 14:09 | Open on wikis.world
DELETED

@Pharos @corbden @paul @wikipedia

absolutely. i admire wikipedia's scrappy resilience

11 Jun 2023 at 14:21 | Open on techhub.social
Mx. Luna Corbden

@accretionist @Pharos @paul @wikipedia

I agree with that, and was editing Wikipedia in 2005 so I get it, however:

1. I’ve been online a long time and seen things go away that I never thought possible to destroy or decay.

2. There are tools now available to vandals that have never been available before. I read one thing a few weeks ago by a seasoned wikipedian about seeing floods of automated LLM edits to talk pages on controversial articles that was beginning to tax their ability to manage.

mstdn.social/@kissane/11032842

@accretionist @Pharos @paul @wikipedia

I agree with that, and was editing Wikipedia in 2005 so I get it, however:

1. I’ve been online a long time and seen things go away that I never thought possible to destroy or decay.

2. There are tools now available to vandals that have never been available before. I read one thing a few weeks ago by a seasoned wikipedian about seeing floods of automated LLM edits to talk pages on controversial articles that was beginning to tax their ability to manage.

11 Jun 2023 at 16:05 | Open on defcon.social
DELETED

@corbden @Pharos @paul @wikipedia

LLM edits seem to be a new form of spam. "cognitive spam." it's a matter of adopting to the new spam with countermeasures. a constant arms race

11 Jun 2023 at 16:21 | Open on techhub.social
Lotus

@corbden While not to destroy it, I only seem to hear skepticism about wikipedia from socially conservative people (Im not american so Im not sure if that applies to american conservatives.) Not sure why specifically.

Stuff like doubts about anyone being able to edit (which I then have to follow with everything needing citations and such.)

11 Jun 2023 at 14:19 | Open on hachyderm.io
DELETED

@LotusHopper @corbden

why change your views to fit the data when you can change the data to fit your worldview. and if a resource like wikipedia is immune to that effort, and stands there unmoved by your denial and handwaving, it must be gaslit and have its credibility attacked. the attacks don't have to make sense, they just have to be constant

this is standard operating procedure for some minds: cognitive dissonance is painful, and changing one's mind is apparently an impossibility, so attack attack attack

@LotusHopper @corbden

why change your views to fit the data when you can change the data to fit your worldview. and if a resource like wikipedia is immune to that effort, and stands there unmoved by your denial and handwaving, it must be gaslit and have its credibility attacked. the attacks don't have to make sense, they just have to be constant

11 Jun 2023 at 14:26 | Open on techhub.social
Mx. Luna Corbden

@accretionist @LotusHopper I have defended Wikipedia’s model many-a-time. Lotus, if you’re not in the states, please don’t underestimate the power of insular fundamentalist evangelical groups here, who have been planning a coordinated Christofascist takeover for decades. Highly recommend the docuseries Shiny Happy People which reveals the inner workings of just one such group. I’m a former member of another. They’ve already taken over vast parts of our government. I’ve stopped underestimating the lengths they will go to. They have the will and will do anything within their power to get more power. I know Wikipedia is resilient. I once thought the US government, SCOTUS, the presidency, congress, was resilient, too.

@accretionist @LotusHopper I have defended Wikipedia’s model many-a-time. Lotus, if you’re not in the states, please don’t underestimate the power of insular fundamentalist evangelical groups here, who have been planning a coordinated Christofascist takeover for decades. Highly recommend the docuseries Shiny Happy People which reveals the inner workings of just one such group. I’m a former member of another. They’ve already taken over vast parts of our government. I’ve stopped underestimating the...

11 Jun 2023 at 16:11 | Open on defcon.social
DELETED

@corbden @LotusHopper oh yeah, certain trends are deeply disturbing. but this fight is all there ever was, and ever will be. constant erosion and repair. this is all there is in life. that's not a point for despair, that's a point to smile back at the smile of the malicious, and move on with good work

not out of validation from the world. that may come, but it's a side effect. it's for self-validation: i don't litter. not because i fear punishment. but because i fear what i would think of myself

and as long as people like you and i exist, and we always will, there is progress in this world. and don't ever think the malice and despair out there is greater than that

@corbden @LotusHopper oh yeah, certain trends are deeply disturbing. but this fight is all there ever was, and ever will be. constant erosion and repair. this is all there is in life. that's not a point for despair, that's a point to smile back at the smile of the malicious, and move on with good work

11 Jun 2023 at 16:19 | Open on techhub.social
Mx. Luna Corbden

@accretionist @LotusHopper I hope so. I try to keep a good attitude and fight. I just think complacency is our enemy. We can’t just rely on our institutions to keep on doing their thing without effort to make sure they do.

11 Jun 2023 at 18:13 | Open on defcon.social
Paul Sutton

@corbden @accretionist @paul @wikipedia

Sorry what is LLM?, people keep talking about them but no one has actually explained what it means?

11 Jun 2023 at 18:29 | Open on qoto.org
DELETED

@zleap LLM = large language model. think chatgpt. you assemble this huge trove of conversational data and pluck out new artificial conversations in a statistical manner

11 Jun 2023 at 18:32 | Open on techhub.social
Mx. Luna Corbden

@zleap @accretionist @paul @wikipedia Large Language Models. ChatGPT and their ilk. A type of “AI” that analyses large sets of language and learns ways to regurgitate it such that it’s hard to tell it’s artificial.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_la

11 Jun 2023 at 18:34 | Open on defcon.social
Kevin Leecaster

@paul @wikipedia
You should look at the discussion page around changing the name of the Wikipedia article from Fort Bragg to Fort Liberty. Republicans suck!

11 Jun 2023 at 18:27 | Open on mstdn.social
Jele
fathermucker

@wikipedia LOL you're going to blow up a lot of Christofascist minds.

11 Jun 2023 at 4:21 | Open on mastodon.online
Cobweb 🍂

@wikipedia I had to read this three times to make sure I wasn’t reading it as SantaCon

11 Jun 2023 at 4:22 | Open on corteximplant.com
Steven Sandoval
Covidiocracy
thefathippy

@wikipedia @OutOnTheMoors

<Evil laughter echoes across the darkness> 😂

11 Jun 2023 at 4:50 | Open on mastodon.world
Matt Sicker
cybard
Bø!rge
F.A. Suwijn

@wikipedia The page makes no mention of which country this "organisation" is in. As such it seems to be correct to delete it.

11 Jun 2023 at 10:37 | Open on mastodon.nl
Richard Knipel

@Ratanashi @wikipedia Correct solution is to post the {{Globalize|2=US}} notice at the top of the article, or just fix it yourself.

11 Jun 2023 at 14:01 | Open on wikis.world
F.A. Suwijn

@Pharos Excuse me sir, I don't understand all these things.

11 Jun 2023 at 17:16 | Open on mastodon.nl
DELETED
DELETED
AnthropoceneMan
Shadow Heart
Em :official_verified:

@wikipedia Hahaha! Well played Wikipedia, well played 😁👍

11 Jun 2023 at 18:20 | Open on infosec.exchange
satan
DELETED

@wikipedia @selea l absolutely love how the Satanic Temple does not actually worship Satan, but uses that theme to piss off (read: trigger) the Christians whom they are protesting. It's an amazing level of commitment to trolling and I love it. They do good work for women and LGBTQ+ rights and freedom of religion (and freedom to not have a religion).

13 Jun 2023 at 8:54 | Open on mastodon.social
wakest ⁂

@wikipedia wikipedia shitposts are my new favorite form of entertainment

19 Jun 2023 at 20:37 | Open on social.wake.st
Go Up