Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Richard Knipel

@corbden @accretionist @paul @wikipedia Groups of every conceivable brand of bad politics have been attempting this for 20+ years. It has survived the ill-will of various governments, corporations, and other vandals thanks to the resilience of a global volunteer community that indeed does not take it for granted. Wikipedia abides.

3 comments
DELETED

@Pharos @corbden @paul @wikipedia

absolutely. i admire wikipedia's scrappy resilience

Mx. Luna Corbden

@accretionist @Pharos @paul @wikipedia

I agree with that, and was editing Wikipedia in 2005 so I get it, however:

1. I’ve been online a long time and seen things go away that I never thought possible to destroy or decay.

2. There are tools now available to vandals that have never been available before. I read one thing a few weeks ago by a seasoned wikipedian about seeing floods of automated LLM edits to talk pages on controversial articles that was beginning to tax their ability to manage.

mstdn.social/@kissane/11032842

@accretionist @Pharos @paul @wikipedia

I agree with that, and was editing Wikipedia in 2005 so I get it, however:

1. I’ve been online a long time and seen things go away that I never thought possible to destroy or decay.

2. There are tools now available to vandals that have never been available before. I read one thing a few weeks ago by a seasoned wikipedian about seeing floods of automated LLM edits to talk pages on controversial articles that was beginning to tax their ability to manage.

DELETED

@corbden @Pharos @paul @wikipedia

LLM edits seem to be a new form of spam. "cognitive spam." it's a matter of adopting to the new spam with countermeasures. a constant arms race

Go Up