Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Vin

@dansup @vantablack idk if this is an extreme take but I feel like the people opposed to federating with meta are drawing a line in the sand that they want the fediverse to fail, straight up. establishing a culture of preemptively blocking any large instance because they are large is extremely dangerous

like it's not possible for the fediverse to grow without getting adopted in this way, so to explicitly oppose growth means to me that you oppose federation as a concept. what am I missing?

2 comments
Jaime Herazo

@Grapevine @dansup @vantablack
You're missing that this is Meta we're talking about, they're consistently proven as bad actors for a decade, even governments have problems getting them to not do shitty stuff, inviting them here is a terrible idea

Fedo ¶

@Grapevine@mastodon.social @dansup@mastodon.social @vantablack@beach.city Fediverse servers get blocked for poor moderation or for the presence of dangerous communities. Meta has showed multiple times that they don’t care about the health of their communities, rather their business model is based on toxic interactions that generate engagement.
The thing is we simply already know that they won’t match the basic standards of any decent Fedi server, also they could potentially use data uploaded from other servers to profile users outside META. It’s not some kind of speculation, it’s just what META is

@Grapevine@mastodon.social @dansup@mastodon.social @vantablack@beach.city Fediverse servers get blocked for poor moderation or for the presence of dangerous communities. Meta has showed multiple times that they don’t care about the health of their communities, rather their business model is based on toxic interactions that generate engagement.
The thing is we simply already know that they won’t match the basic standards of any decent Fedi server, also they could potentially use data uploaded from...

Go Up