@darius When BigCorp insists on an NDA, that's enough to warrant a public warning of possible impending harm.
Any entity wanting to privately discuss, under penalty of legal harm, any matter regarding participation with a network that explicitly functions under a principle of complete openness and transparency should always be met first and foremost with suspicion and concern for harms they may commit, intentional or not.
You understand that, surely.
@ricardoharvin correct! And not incompatible with what I'm saying