@ricardoharvin correct! And not incompatible with what I'm saying
@darius It seemed to me your post was claiming accepting the NDA was *required* in order to know if there was a possible danger approaching, and a warning necessary.
If I misunderstood, I apologize.
@ricardoharvin it is simply required to know things that a corporation will only say under NDA
@darius I understand that.
@darius It seemed to me your post was claiming accepting the NDA was *required* in order to know if there was a possible danger approaching, and a warning necessary.
If I misunderstood, I apologize.