Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Spread Mastodon

@mike @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport

Hi @mike - would definitely be up for Canadian.social to be in a future round robin.

The initial set of 60K registered users was just a stab objective metrics for high capacity servers. Very up for suggestions to move that down to numbers that would hit solid but mid-level serves as well.

And welcome exactly this feedback.

13 comments
Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag:

@spreadmastodon@mastodon.social @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport Sorry got my back up as I don't think a lot of really good instances would ever hit those numbers. I apreciate the transparency and the effort.

Jon

I agree with @mike and @CrazyMyra that the 60K limit's problmeatic and with @brian about the problems of the "make the big sites bigger" approach. What's really needed is a series of questions that matches people to an instance where they're likely to have a good initial experience -- good moderation as a minimum bar, and beyond that based on geography, interests, or diversity. Sending everybody to .social is likely to be counter-productive.

@spreadmastodon@mastodon.social @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport

I agree with @mike and @CrazyMyra that the 60K limit's problmeatic and with @brian about the problems of the "make the big sites bigger" approach. What's really needed is a series of questions that matches people to an instance where they're likely to have a good initial experience -- good moderation as a minimum bar, and beyond that based on geography, interests, or diversity. Sending everybody to .social is likely to be counter-productive.

Spread Mastodon

@jdp23 @mike @brian @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport

Taking notes on all this, thanks! Definitely will update the MAU and registered users numbers, but want to think more about what still ensures high capacity in an objective way. Up for suggestions to those numbers.

Brian Lawson

@spreadmastodon@mastodon.social @jdp23 @mike @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport

“what still ensures high capacity in an objective way. Up for suggestions to those numbers.”

I’m probably just dense, but I’m not grocking why there needs to be an arbitrary number of users to define high capacity. There are sites that report metrics on the uptime of instances, which seems to be a better measure than number of users.

Brian Lawson

@spreadmastodon@mastodon.social @jdp23 @mike @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport

Saying it another way: I think the ultimate goal is to get a new user attached to the right instance. If they don’t know or care, then fine, go to .social. But if they have specific niche interests, then helping to guide them towards options is in support of “getting them attached to the right instance.”

tl;dr - best fit > server size

Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag:

@spreadmastodon@mastodon.social @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport A few suggestions:

Sports should be follow category. There is a super active sports community on Mastodon.

Hockey is missing from your sports hashtag topics. This is an unforgivable sin. #HNOM

I picked some follow categories went to the next step and automatically followed a a bunch of people. Maybe an intermediary step asking if you want to follow these people?

Great first steps!

Spread Mastodon

@mike @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport

Which top accounts would you recommend for sports? Our goal here was:

1. not bots or no Twitter cross-posting accounts with no human involved

2. Actively and regularly posting on topic

Mike Fraser :Jets: :flag:

@spreadmastodon@mastodon.social @spreadmastodon@venera.social @fediversereport I'm primarily focused on hockey, look at the #HNOM hashtag and you should find a lot of users there. Also @TheHockeyWriters is a non bot account.

Go Up