Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Joelle

The most common gender affirming surgery is breast augmentation -- in cis (non-trans) women.

The regret rate is around 20%.

Gender affirming surgeries in trans people have around a 1% regret rate.

Guess which people need approval from a mental health provider...

50 comments
Kevin Karhan :verified:

@joelle the same people that get denied surgery as minors when the other ones don't...

Hyolobrika

@kkarhan
Minors should be protected. And if you don't agree, stay the fuck away from them.
@joelle

caitp

@Hyolobrika calm down bro, no need to swear at people

Oblomov

@joelle that reminds me of a dark humor comic strip, where happy people were arrested because the whole system was built in the pursuit of happiness, not actually achieving it.

Doxy_cycling, S.P. MPH MLS

@joelle

I would love a source for this if you have one please

Janne

@doxy_cycling @joelle it's almost miraculous. In general, gender affirming care has really low regret rate, compared to *any* medical procedures. People are happy with the results, unlike e.g. patient satisfaction with their knee or hip surgeries!

Regret is a rare unicorn.

And what little there exists, is usually caused by peer rejection and social condemnation.

arthroplasty.biomedcentral.com

Janne

@doxy_cycling @joelle source for the last claim, in Finnish: laakarilehti.fi/tieteessa/kats

And the original article:

Landen M ym. Factors predictive of regret in sex reassignment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1998;97:284–9.

bskmk 𒀭

@joelle do we know what is the regret rate for breast implants in trans women though?

BewonerWest020

@joelle And the sickness afterwards. Chronicle diseases from leaking silicone.

Jan Bosch

@joelle would you know rough total numbers for each?

Tin Bee 🥫🐝

@joelle
Out of interest, what is the approval rate for the surgery? Does it vary depending on which way someone is transitioning?

canleaf08 ⌘ ✅

@tinbee @joelle Yes, it depends. You often need to do RLE and show a lot of commitment… Some health care systems want to see that in a serious manner and gates are often sealed shut if not….

canleaf08 ⌘ ✅

@tinbee @joelle Certainly: Nobody gets in Germany approved without name change and Evaluations done. It is up to the MDKs to honour documentation. Some evaluators there even deny the most obvious case. The approval rate is therefore very low.

canleaf08 ⌘ ✅

@joelle It was never about regret numbers… It is about having control over bodies.

CBplus

@joelle

A perfect example of how delusion turns off the brain. It is precisely because there is psychological assistance before gender affirming surgery that holds the number of people who regret their decision afterwards low. Because those who would regret it are selected through psychological care beforehand. Beside of this: plastic surgery is promoted by social media. Hence, after a few years more people regret it because they succumbed to a hype.

Sibrosan

@joelle

"Gender affirming surgeries in trans people have around a 1% regret rate.

Guess which people need approval from a mental health provider..."

That might suggest requiring such approval is quite effective in lowering the regret rate...🤔

Joelle

@sibrosan One thing we know is that regret rate over the years has not changed, despite gatekeeping being reduced (albeit not eliminated). I.E. it’s easier to get trans-related surgery now than it was 30 years ago, yet regret rate has not gotten higher.

Sibrosan

@joelle "One thing we know is that regret rate over the years has not changed, despite gatekeeping being reduced"

That does make your point more plausible.

British Tech Guru

@joelle I wonder what the regret rate for those with tonsillitis who undergo a tonsillectomy would be. My guess is the regret rate for those with tonsillitis that don't have a tonsillectomy would be zero as they'd all be dead.

Joelle

@britishtechguru Tonsillitis is not usually fatal. Tonsillectomy is done to improve quality of life, not to keep someone alive, generally.

That said, looks like it has about a 7% regret rate.

But even surgeries everyone agrees are done to keep someone alive, like cancer surgeries, have a significantly higher regret rate than the gender reassignement surgeries.

British Tech Guru

@joelle I had a tonsillectomy at 7 years old. Adenoids too. No regrets.

Haven't felt the need for a sex change op but I bet there are plenty doctors who'd do one without enforcing a psychiatric evaluation.

Joelle

@britishtechguru You’re right, there is. They do genital sex reassignments on intersex infants. And, yes, there is a high regret rate in those infants when they grow up — unlike adults that have surgery or even kids who receive puberty blockers. I’ll note the infant surgeries on intersex kids are not banned in any USA state (or elsewhere in the world).

British Tech Guru

@joelle The number of hermaphrodites or intersex babies born is an extreme minority. In my 56 years on this planet I have met just one.

Joelle

@britishtechguru I’ve met dozens (that I know of — most people don’t talk about thie reproductive organs and/or chromosomes and/or hormone sensitivities in random conversation!) and am married to one. But the size of that minority is irrelevant, the point is that there is an entirely different standard applied to trans people — because of moral disapproval.

British Tech Guru

@joelle Most if not all of that disapproval is based on interpretation of the bible. The bible was compiled 300 years after the fact. It was heavily edited with scriptures not representing the ideas of the pope of the day just being burned. The bible is basically one man's decree as to how people should live.

I notice that in non Christian cultures, transgender seems more accepted. The faffafini in Asia, theres a group in India. Not sure if they're called hiru.

It leads me more to think that the bible is too restrictive. Mind, eastern religions are more about how to live while western religions are more about how to prepare for death.

@joelle Most if not all of that disapproval is based on interpretation of the bible. The bible was compiled 300 years after the fact. It was heavily edited with scriptures not representing the ideas of the pope of the day just being burned. The bible is basically one man's decree as to how people should live.

Nuno & Lua :DsaprvingLua:

@britishtechguru @joelle we should not commit the error of romanticising the East. The hijras in India are a mix of trans, eunuchs, and intersex individuals and are very low on their social ladder and subject to abuse. Both the west and the east have their own issues with gender discrimination. Also: Most of the west cares little about the bible nowadays, I know it might be a surprise to the US and a few other countries that we don't even care about the religion of our politicians.

Joelle

@ncrav @britishtechguru I do agree we shoudln't romanticize or exoticize the east, but a major reason that the hijras have low social status is due to the legacy of European colonization.

Nuno & Lua :DsaprvingLua:

@joelle @britishtechguru yes the colonization didn't help but all those centuries (millennia perhaps) of caste systems didn't exactly help as well.

T. T. Perry

@britishtechguru

@joelle

Anyone can cut off a baby boy's foreskin. Don't even need to be a doctor. That's how little value we invest as a society in the rights of children, and how hypocritical cisgender people are.

Lady Gee

@joelle Hmmm 🤔 Could breast implants be banned under some of these new laws. Some reward people for turning others in? Perhaps this needs to be tested. I'm sure gop men will agree that that is a procedure that involves sexual organs.

Joelle

@travellovewine Unfortunately the ones I’ve seen only apply to trans people. Unnecessary genital surgeries on infants for intersex conditions are fine under these laws, as are cosmetic breast surgeries for non-trans people (including kids — which does happen, as about 5,000 cis people under 18 have breast augmentation a year, and some number [not sure how many] have breast reduction as well). It’s only trans peoples’ medical decisions that are criminalized.

183231bcb

@joelle @travellovewine It pisses me off how few news outlets report this fact. Like, if you only read the reports from major "journalists," you'd think there are specific medical procedures that are "new, dangerous, and untested" that Republicans are banning. But really they are banning old and well-understood treatments ONLY for trans people and explicitly allowing the same treatments for cis people.

deilann

@travellovewine many of the laws are written explicitly to make sure it is still legal for 16 year old cis girls to have breast augmentations @joelle

Flaming Cheeto

@joelle the people who are trying to deny the existence of trans people only care if the man approves of a cis woman's boob job

矢霧波江

@joelle An admission that GRS is superficial only

DELETED

@joelle this is great point!!!

First counterpoint that popped up to my mind was reversibility, are there any data to that?

183231bcb

@metodrybar @joelle Breast augmentation is reversible, whether it's done for a cis person or a trans person. I know cis women who got mastectomies and then breast augmentation a few weeks later, covered by insurance both times (usually as a treatment for breast cancer, in which case it's also followed up by an anti-estrogen, the same drug that politicians call "puberty blockers.")

On the other hand, I was a toddler when I got my adenoids removed. That IS irreversible.

n_to

@joelle I'd assume the percentage of trans women who are doing breast augmentations for themselves is higher than with cis women who in many cases are pushed there by other people. :(

Joelle

@n_to I do think it's complicated because I don't think trans people can operate outside of misogyny -- I actually have some agreement with non-exclusionary radfems here that this is a form of sexism we absolutely need to address.

I wrote about the complexity of reasons trans women might have surgeries a while ago: aninjusticemag.com/what-do-you

But I do agree that it seems like most trans people are making a decision they are long-term happy with having made.

@n_to I do think it's complicated because I don't think trans people can operate outside of misogyny -- I actually have some agreement with non-exclusionary radfems here that this is a form of sexism we absolutely need to address.

I wrote about the complexity of reasons trans women might have surgeries a while ago: aninjusticemag.com/what-do-you

Sablebadger

@joelle I wonder if we banned ALL gender affirming surgeries including breast implants in cis women, how fast would the patriarchy reverse course when the old thirsty white dudes realized that it affected them...

I'm of course being cynical here, and do not in any way support banning any form of gender affirming anything.

Vincarsi

@joelle they're all about "personal responsibility" until it's something they find icky. Then they're all "we must protect you from making a choice that we find offensive!"

mzan

@joelle the study suggests that the mental approval process is beneficial, because there is a low regret rate. They say:

> We believe this study corroborates the improvements made in regard to selection criteria for GAS.

So the low regret rate is the effect of the selection criteria.

One can discuss about how to determine if the selection filter is too much stringent, but not that it is not useful.

Joelle

@mzan We see basically no change in regret between the incredibly difficult standards imposed on trans people in the 50s and 60s and the current standards which are much looser.

We've known trans people present the story the gatekeepers want to hear, to access medical care. That was true in the 1950s and is true now. Yet despite this, the regret rate remains nearly zero.

I'm also unaware of any studies actually looking at whether gatekeeping lowers regret (Bostos, et al, 2021 didn't).

mzan

@joelle I cannot follow you. This study ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ suggests that selection criteria are useful because regrets are very low, 1%. And you said initially that the regrets in the wild west of breast augmentation is 20%. So this is already a proof that some regolumentation is beneficial.

We can discuss if the 20% of regrets are linked also to the low quality of some surgeon, and not only to patients not knowing really what they want. But, the difference is rather large.

@joelle I cannot follow you. This study ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ suggests that selection criteria are useful because regrets are very low, 1%. And you said initially that the regrets in the wild west of breast augmentation is 20%. So this is already a proof that some regolumentation is beneficial.

Joelle

@mzan The authors note that selection criteria have improved (I.E. gotten loser) for GAS. They didn't actually study that though, it's conjecture. They also didn't compare not having the psychological gatekeeping with having it (if they think the modern standards are better, then what about even loser ones? They don't know because they didn't study it).

MeowcaTheoRange :karkat:

@joelle Guess we're gonna have to outlaw woman... 😭😭😭

/joke

Voron

@joelle I was an orthopedic massage therapist & fitness trainer for years, & let’s just say I ran into a lot of clients with regrets & back problems

Deirdre Saoirse Moen

@joelle I’d have guessed circumcision is the most common gender affirming surgery, but only in minors.

Go Up