|
Top-level
 @Gargron yes, of course you're right; I meant interop with networks not currently in the Fediverse; bridges across the ActivityPub/open protocol gap. We run moa.party because we believe interop with Twitter is important, even if occasionally problematic. 2 comments
@Gargron totally, it doesn't make sense for up and comers in particular, so I agree that long term the future lies in the [[fediverse]]. But the same argument, I believe, applies to bridges: they increase the value of networks. |
Gregory's Server
@flancian More networks should implement ActivityPub, even if they are themselves not open-source/AGPLv3. I don't see any reason why any new social network (like that Glass one that recently popped up) shouldn't do that to instantly gain access to an established userbase.