Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
13 comments
Sebastien 🌍 replied to f♯ a♯ ∞

@Tsadiq lots of time and euros have been wasted over a stupid directive that is already outdated. You don't care we waste tax money? 🤔@svenjacobs

Johann̟ replied to Sebastien
@SebastienK ahhhhhh 'wasting tax money' it's never been an ecological problem, was it? @Tsadiq @svenjacobs
Sven Jacobs :androidHead: replied to Sebastien

@SebastienK @Tsadiq Well, then we're at my first answer again b/c initially this was just voluntary — no law — and Apple was refusing USB-C for their smartphones for many years. If someone could have saved a lot of money and bureaucracy it would have been Apple. All the EU wanted was just to reduce electronic waste 😞

Sebastien 🌍 replied to Sven Jacobs :androidHead:

@svenjacobs and now we have a law. The EU could have saved a lot of money by understanding technology. It clearly doesn't as it has repeated the same mistake as with USB A. USB C is not the future of charging phones and charging phones is what this directive is all about

Waste of cables and tax euros. 🤷🏽‍♂️
@Tsadiq

f♯ a♯ ∞ replied to Sebastien

@SebastienK well, you ever tried connecting a usb peripheral to a phone or tablet? Probably not as you seem to think cables are for charging only.

And still, that *is* a usage some people have, but you only see the problem by that very little spectrum of yours and dismiss everything else.

But congrats, imho you're just doing a fine job at being an apple bigot 👌

@svenjacobs

Sebastien 🌍 replied to f♯ a♯ ∞

@Tsadiq oh yes I daily charge my android work phone over micro usb. I always try to put it in the wrong way. Every day I get reminded of how wonderful the EU directives are

My iPhone on the other hand is a cable virgin I think 😂
@svenjacobs

f♯ a♯ ∞ replied to Sebastien

@SebastienK then again, we're not talking about charging here. We're talking external screen, digital audio, storing devices, accessibility tools.

And that's why there should be only one standard, and this standard is usb-c because it's not a proprietary standard, whether you like it or not.

@svenjacobs

Sebastien 🌍 replied to f♯ a♯ ∞

@Tsadiq Is this a paralel universe?

Wireless, wireless, wireless, wireless.

I do all these things without a cable, Android can't be that far behind that I don't see why you would need a cable for any of those? If Apple would ditch the cable altogether I would not miss any of those

@svenjacobs

f♯ a♯ ∞ replied to Sebastien

@SebastienK wireless implies authentication, if not you're opening your devices to mitm attacks. Unthinkable for sensitive data. Cable ensure direct connection to devices.

You can't wireless from devices that are not self-powered - you ever heard about issues with lithium in batteries?

You can't configure wireless tools if you're not able to see the screen. Visually disabled people? To hell with them. Broken screen? Welp, too bad.

@svenjacobs

f♯ a♯ ∞ replied to f♯ a♯ ∞

@SebastienK

As i said earlier, you only see through the spectrum your very, very narrow usages and very very wide privileges.

Just because *you* do something doesn't mean everybody else wants, can afford or is able to do it like you do.

You're just self-centered.

@svenjacobs

Sebastien 🌍 replied to f♯ a♯ ∞

@Tsadiq you mean because “we” do it a different way “you" need to adapt or shut up. That’s the whole thing I'm getting from the answers I got.

@svenjacobs

Sven Jacobs :androidHead: replied to Sebastien

@SebastienK Maybe you should become a technical consultant for the EU then if you think you're doing a better job than them?

You may be on the technical bleeding edge here but that doesn't necessarily count for millions of other people 🤷‍♂️

@Tsadiq

Sebastien 🌍 replied to Sven Jacobs :androidHead:

@svenjacobs I’m not on the bleeding edge. I'm just a consumer in the EU using todays products 😉 @Tsadiq

Go Up