Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Chris Trottier

@JudeNunga That’s right. You sell your labour.

And people who write software, administrate instances, and provide content are providing labour that others are willing to pay for. So why not give them the means to make a living?

As you already noted, the Fediverse can be different *if* we prove and build a different, more sustainable model. Which could include — but isn’t limited to — crowdfunding, non-profits, and co-ops.

6 comments
JudeNunga replied to Chris

@atomicpoet

If people are willing to pay for their work, I don't have an issue with that.

However if people don't want to pay for something they see no need for, I have no issue with that either.

The Fediverse already has crowdfunding, non profits and co ops, it already exists, are you suggesting building another one? Why?

Improvements can be made, but if people are happy with what already exists, and don't see a need for more, than they aren't going to be interested in paying for more.

Chris Trottier replied to JudeNunga

@JudeNunga I’m suggesting that people consider crowdfunding, non-profits, and co-ops.

And again, not everyone is considering them as alternatives to Big Tech.

JudeNunga replied to Chris

@atomicpoet

I have no argument with that at all.

IMO "big tech" will fail to make any inroads on the Fediverse, but this of course is just my opinion. Trust has been destroyed, and it is extremely hard to rebuild that.

TeaPolitics replied to Chris

@atomicpoet @JudeNunga
Would you turn down a donation from Microsoft?

TeaPolitics replied to Chris

@atomicpoet @JudeNunga
In a purely hypothetical case, it would make sense for them to beef up a particular instance so that it drives users away from Meta/Twitter, which should in theory drive more instance makers to consider hosting via Azure.

Also I wouldnt put it past them to offer deep discounts on hosting instances for the same purpose.

Go Up