@atomicpoet Easily said. If this move is widely panned and the only users that embrace it are those that wander into it without context from current Meta properties, this will still prove to be a relative tsunami. Big boats make big waves.
Top-level
@atomicpoet Easily said. If this move is widely panned and the only users that embrace it are those that wander into it without context from current Meta properties, this will still prove to be a relative tsunami. Big boats make big waves. 3 comments
@atomicpoet I don't think most people are going to give a damn about the fediverse per se. That's too inside baseball. What's built will be marketed in more user centric terms. What we're discussing here is the strategic announcement, the true objective of which is to build insurance for the future that the big party stays on Meta properties. They don't have come up with a winner here, they just have to make it confusing for existing users to find the door out. @krishooper People may not give a damn about the word "Fediverse". But they definitely give a damn about whether or not the social media service they use can be acquired by Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg. And that's the story we need to tell people. |
@krishooper Will Meta's own users even embrace this? Horizon Worlds isn't the success that Meta hoped it would be.
But in case Meta's userbase does start using the Fediverse, we definitely need to create a plan of action.