I don't feel as strongly about quote posts as I did in 2018. Personally, I am not a fan, but there is clearly a lot of demand for it. We're considering it.
I don't feel as strongly about quote posts as I did in 2018. Personally, I am not a fan, but there is clearly a lot of demand for it. We're considering it. It's what I miss the most. I had a small account with good interaction and a fabulous timeline that I built from quote tweets. @Gargron as a user who has previously voiced support for quoting, I feel almost obligated to request that it /not/ be implemented. It's one of those little "not here" things that I think has made using Mastodon that much kinder on my brain. ...that said, it would improve my "credit to user XYZ who found this" workflow immensely, which makes up like 90% of my threads on Bird Hell. Dunno if I'd be doing the same here - I've mostly been keeping myself "focused" on rambling :cate: Until I saw @Gargron's justification for Mastodon banning quote posts I didn't see a problem. I decided, on balance, this decision was correct and was surprised many insisted it impaired journalists' incentive to come here. Like many things quote posting can be used for good or bad. Opting out is a poor idea as you'd miss those using it for balanced debate. The alternative is using copy and paste to provide context. But that risks people saying they've been taken out of context. #QuotePosts @Gargron Several times Neil Gaiman quote posted me on the other place and I invariably retweeted it even when he was being critical of me and I felt the need to defend myself from his criticism. My stats went off the scale when this happened but that wasn't the reason I was happy. It helped everybody that both sides of an argument were available to everyone. Opting out of quote posting seems an unwise thing to do. If someone thinks they've been treated unfairly they can block. #QuotePosts @Gargron seems to me it's just a client implementation detail of how you want to display links. @Gargron imo something more akin to backlinks https://help.obsidian.md/How+to/Working+with+backlinks would be more powerful. Please DON'T. @Gargron Please don’t. Please, please, PLEASE don’t! Over the short period of time that I am actively using Mastodon, it has become so much more Twitter-like, including all the negative parts, and QT’s are a essential ingredient to the 🐦 site’s un-culture. So far, Mastodon is faring quite well in dampening the Twitter effect, but there is certainly a breaking point — and that might very well come with QT’s. @Gargron they aren't any different to replies and can be reported all the same. 🤷♂️ I'd like to not see ones of people I blocked.. Like at all. Twitter shows me what the QTer posts.. I don't even want that of I have the original poster blocked. 👍 @Gargron I'd rather see a native toot translating capability than the quote boost, TBH. @Gargron I‘m part of the recent Twitter migration and first I was confused, that the quotation feature was „missing“. But in my opinion, that we don’t have that function here, is a huge contribution to keep toxic conversations down. You just can’t p**p out a witty and sharp comment as easy. So I‘m in favor not to implement this sort of obvious feature. @Gargron I am ambivalent on quote posts, but I quite like how you handled post editing in a way that eliminates most of the concerns raised on it. A similar approach of listening to the concerns and building with them in mind would make it feasible to not be a destructive feature. @Gargron @Gargron Don’t need or want it. I agree with the reasoning to leave it out. Better cross-instance interactions and performance much more important imho. @Gargron I have to say it’s the main thing I miss. Could #mastodonworld consider it too please? @Gargron @Gargron I hope you do allow them. I like to comment on stories as I pass them along. I hesitate to bring things I didn't post myself to people's attention without explaining why. @Gargron I feel that there is a need for a better means to post comments on web articles. And that too as a post on the person's own account. @Gargron I don't like it. I joined the fediverse some months ago and really enjoy that people talk with each other and not about other people, which I think will start with commented boosts. I think it is a good thing that discussions related to a toot are only possible in one direction and avoid fuzzyfication of discussion. It avoids that accounts with high numbers of followers take over the work/ideas of others and start a new discussion in their bubble. Just my 2ct @Gargron @Gargron It's understandable that in 2018, a year after the initial releasing of Mastodon, the level of idealism was probably peaking. Since a more practical but common sense approaching to various (and not too essential) topics have emerged, been emerging. That's the way to maintain certain core virtues/values and make the platform more widely used and easier to adopt for common SoMe sapiences.👍 @Gargron FINALLY! @Gargron I like them, because I like to agree and expand upon someone’s post. If I read theirs and then make my own based on theirs it’s like I’m stealing their ideas and that makes me uncomfortable. |
@Gargron It would help in the continued #twitterMigration me thinks.