Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Mike Masnick โœ…

I wrote about how I cannot understand why anyone is interested in joining a new centralized social media platform when we now have a great opportunity to move to protocols instead of platforms. techdirt.com/2022/12/21/why-wo

62 comments
kgoldsholl

@mmasnick Are instances prohibited from selling ads or capturing user data? If not, that would be one reason.

Kansas Grant

@mmasnick Maybe it's related to why children like Lunchables.

Officer-involved pooping

@mmasnick I firmly believe the answer is in the acculturation that massive platforms have fostered. Many people join services not to slowly and carefully cultivate a highly relevant and informative content stream - they want a quickly assembled deluge of distracting and emotionally engaging crap. The blog and RSS paradigm is not the dominant platform.

To that end IMHO, for mastodon or similar to challenge the big players, discovery needs to be optimized in ways we haven't seen before.

Officer-involved pooping

@mmasnick *if* big players enter the federated space, I wouldn't be surprised if there was an attempt to use niche focus as an anchor. E.g. not a "Google" instance, but an instance focused on fandom, programming, photography, etc.. not unlike the stackexchange model.

Saul Tannenbaum

@mmasnick The younger you are, the less you remember the Internet as a mesh of protocols rather than a place for products.

Mike Stevens :ohno:

@mmasnick why do normal people do any number of ultimately detrimental things? It's usually just about convenience and familiarity, right? And doing what the majority of their friends are doing, avoiding a new learning curve and new habit formation no matter how much it might improve life in the long run, etc. (You probably cover that in the story, I'll read it in a bit!)

Michael

@mmasnick personally still expect that re-centralisation will ultimately occur, as it did with email, which is now dominated by a small number of big players, with self hosting almost impossible these days.

I did find these arguments quite compelling:

lucumr.pocoo.org/2022/11/14/sc

Hoping Iโ€™m wrong though.

Anathema Device

@michael @mmasnick "self hosting almost impossible"

That's just not true. There are literally thousands of hosting companies, and almost all of them allow you to have your own email addresses, servers, the lot. The fact that most people don't bother, doesn't mean it's not possible or easy to do.

Michael

@anathema_device @mmasnick lol. I used to self host. Sadly deliverability was an ongoing problem, so now I just pay one of the bigger players.

Of course itโ€™s technically possible to self host email. Itโ€™s not even difficult. But itโ€™s a constant battle to ensure your recipients actually receive your emails, and more often than not emails just disappear without trace, rhyme, or reason.

Alexander The 1st

@michael @anathema_device @mmasnick Right; scalability is why, instead of people managing their own physical servers, whole companies just offload the work to AWS or Azure. At some point, you don't farm your own silicon for transistors, you let someone else do that.

Pekka Lund

@michael @mmasnick
Good points and there are further issues for Mastodon to become true alternative for Twitter.

Lack of proper search of content, even on the protocol level, is one big problem. It more or less eliminates most of the use cases I use Twitter for.

It would be pretty hard to implement now so that it would scale and work with federation with minimal delays that Twitter provides.

Also it's just big waste of collaborative effort if all content produced here isn't searchable later.

@michael @mmasnick
Good points and there are further issues for Mastodon to become true alternative for Twitter.

Lack of proper search of content, even on the protocol level, is one big problem. It more or less eliminates most of the use cases I use Twitter for.

It would be pretty hard to implement now so that it would scale and work with federation with minimal delays that Twitter provides.

Mike Masnick โœ…

@michael i'm not sure I see that as quite as big a problem. This is the nice bit of the federated model. The fact that *SOME* can create their own instances, or that if a "centralized" instance decides to do evil stuff, it's much easier to leave... creates a pretty good incentive structure. A centralized player comes in and makes it easy for end users who don't want complexity, but the rest keeps them from acting as an evil for the network.

Bernd Porr

@mmasnick Sort of history repeats. 10 years ago when Facebook was the dominant platform then something called "twitter" suddenly entered the scene. Then a lot of people didn't "get" twitter because it connects strangers according to interest and allows scrutiny being totally open. It has become the prime platform for connecting journos to experts. Now #mastodon is perfectly capable to fill this space. Again it will be around not for the masses but for the people shaping discourse.

Barry Page

@mmasnick this could become Google's moment - connect gmail's chat to the fediverse

notthatkaren

@mmasnick It seems that many of the holdouts are ones that feel tied monetarily or by ego (lg following) to the bird app-also the one gravitating to places like Post. Completely missing that the problems caused by putting all your eggs in one basket are not solved by just putting all your eggs in different basket. ION- I saw my first rage farming/clickbait *toot* yesterday. Muted/blocked and smiled widely knowing there was no algorithm here to reward/amplify that. I like that.

Anathema Device

@mmasnick great article again, Mike.

Pity your resident trolls make the comments unusable :( Perhaps Santa will put something better for them to do in their stockings?

Jack Yan (็”„็ˆตๆฉ)

@mmasnick Iสผd love to have our own instance since we pay for a server, but computers have become much harder to use in the last 15 years (at least to me as a layman). I used to know how to install stuff on a server but now itสผs more command-line where it looks like you need a degree in computer science! Not sure if Iสผm typical, but this may be why some of us went to a big Mastodon instance.

Anathema Device

@jackyan @mmasnick I suspect that ways to install Mastodon on a self-hosted instance will become easier, same as Wordpress made it easier to set up your own blog. The need is there, someone will fill it.

Alex K

@mmasnick
I love how you captured the Fediverse thought process, I am definitely considering Step 3, making my own instance, I just need to come up with my domain name haha.

Gojira1000

@mmasnick I've been watching that with some interest. There seems to be a contingent of "users" that have either been trained into the role of captive audience/clout-chasing or who are scared (or lazy) about learning something new.

Eric Ravenwolf ๐Ÿ‘ป

@mmasnick I posted something about this on fb and content creators all want large centralized social media they said. It's odd cause a few were socialists lol I'm not sure if they fully understood what decentralized meant

John Bailey

@mmasnick

Thinking is hard and intimidating.

Most people want someone else to do it for them.

Your piece is bang-on.

Puxley

@mmasnick great and insightful read...next year will be interesting considering Mozilla's recent announcement ๐Ÿ˜Ž

australia.etc

@mmasnick I think this past year has had a whole lot of people thinking about their data freedom and being โ€˜ownedโ€™ by for-profit social media companies. Imagine making phone calls that are interrupted randomly by adverts that also listen to what you are saying and which get in the way of actual conversation. This is the thing (among many) which has caused me and others to run away from it as fast as I can! #mastodon :fediverse:

suldrew ๐Ÿšฒ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ

@mmasnick Looking at various people promoting post and hive and such and all I can say is "lol good luck"

Doctor Memory

@suldrew @mmasnick in the immortal words of George W Bush, โ€œThere's an old saying in Tennessee โ€” I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee โ€” that says, fool me once, shame on โ€” shame on you. Fool me โ€” you can't get fooled again.โ€

Chuck, just Chuck

@mmasnick, normies donโ€™t care about this kind of thing, they just want it to work, without putting in any effort.
Only techies care about this kind of thing.

Torbjรถrn Bjรถrkman

@mmasnick The line "Perhaps Iโ€™m biased (note: I am biased) " is great, but also very wrong here. And as much as I love my sarcasm served deadpan... isn't it really: "I already studied this for yonks, became an expert and made up my mind while you lot were still soiling your online diapers" ...?

rusty

@mmasnick I could write a thesis about that. About habitual thinking and how it traps in you in well, your comfortable ways of thinking and doing.

Actuallyl, I have.

Jeffrey T. Davis

@mmasnick Maybe not the most important feature, but a clear issue for Mastodon and similar: verification. It's valuable for readers and for civic info. Self-verification has many pitfalls that I won't spend time on because, simply, I think it misses the point. When I'm reading and see that my mayor has posted something, I want *someone else* to say "yes, checks out". I don't want to do the homework myself and I don't want to count on public figures having bothered to do so or not.

Jeffrey T. Davis

@mmasnick For that, a central trusted authority is a feature not a bug. That can work well in tandem with an open, decentralized protocol, but it'll need revenue and a way to get there from here. I don't think we've got that figured out.

David

@mmasnick you're preaching to the choir here. ;-)

stevie__b โ™ฌ

@mmasnick

For whatever reason, the old castles are crumbling.

Good read. European influenced? : )

Laurie Brunner

@mmasnick Great article. When is techdirt going to add a Mastodon link button?

Ricardo

@mmasnick maybe you've covered it in a previous article, but I would be interested in learning more about how content moderation works here and how it compares to a centralized system.

Jen Andre

@mmasnick
The move to centralized services has been primarily driven by user experience. Less choices, less work to get the use case I want accomplished. That's why

Many of us remember the early internet which was totally decentralized, protocol-driven.Your gmail example is a good one. Designing a decentralized user experience that has less friction than a controlled one is very hard and frankly if it's a choice to do the easier thing vs something that is slightly harder but offers more flexibility, they will choose the first unless there is some extremely compelling driver

@mmasnick
The move to centralized services has been primarily driven by user experience. Less choices, less work to get the use case I want accomplished. That's why

Many of us remember the early internet which was totally decentralized, protocol-driven.Your gmail example is a good one. Designing a decentralized user experience that has less friction than a controlled one is very hard and frankly if it's a choice to do the easier thing vs something that is slightly harder but offers more flexibility,...

Mike Masnick โœ…

@funcuddles yeah, i spent a lot of time talking about that in the protocols/platforms paper

Nick

@mmasnick cos not everyone is a nerd, pretty simple

david

@mmasnick @nickcolley I would agree. Picking the right people to follow/interact with is enough. One doesnโ€™t needs to follow the nerds! Bringing your friends with you helps too.

*|FNAME|* 327.46ppm ๐ŸŒŽ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

@mmasnick this! 1000% this!

Over time weโ€™ve witnessed the gradual corruption of the โ€˜digital town squareโ€™ through monetization and now its collapse in real time because of centralization.

Why the fuck would anyone willingly sign up to do all that over again?!

Caio C. G. Oliveira

@mmasnick congratulations on this piece. I have read it earlier today and is really good!

Taci7

@mmasnick wow, the quality of responses here vs Twitter or Reddit is remarkableโ€ฆ itโ€™s almost like people arenโ€™t karma/follower farming

Mercedes

@mmasnick Please explain the difference to a novice.

Mikal with a k

@mmasnick

I think it's just a matter of time before Big Tech Bro figures out a way to siphon and monetize our data again, maybe with slick federatable instances with lots of shiny features not available elsewhere that draw people away and back into SV's clutches.

Yeah, the nerds or principled early adopters here will stick to our niches, but I'd like to see more proactive efforts to at least slow a new re-centralization.

BduzBoop

@mmasnick you explaining the whole choice thing at the beginning is what gave me encouragement to just roll with it. Now I love it, so many interesting things. Post feels like a product, a new magazine. Mastodon feels like a library where talking is encouraged. PS. Tip the librarians.

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณๅผ ๆฎฟๆŽ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

@mmasnick Have we not had "protocols instead of platforms" before? Isn't email that? Or the whole web?

There's a reason why platforms became popular: they addressed a (perceived or real) failing of the 'protocol'. That has to be addressed or another platform will rise.

Paul Davidson

@mmasnick At the end of the day, people just need something that works and can handle the traffic of a major social media platform. Ninety-nine percent don't care whether it is a centralized or open platform.

Joshua Arnao

@mmasnick I think it comes down to decentralized is just confusing. Mastodon has a huge learning curve where Twitter just made sense for a long time.

Go Up