@humanetech IMO "true interoperability" between disparate software should be such that only the features that intersect between the two are interoperable. For example, if someone makes a hypothetical forum, it won't make much sense for it to interoperate with Mastodon. It totally could, but that would be detrimental to the UX.
For example, Smithereen groups and walls aren't interoperable with the existing microblogging software, and it's fine.
@grishka @humanetech
No, it would NOT be detrimental to the UX.
This is what Gestalt Principles is about and also my Talk for ActivityPub Conf was about.
This is stealing content and hiding content for the user.
If my friend on software bar decides to send me official type="xy" to my software foo the whole sense of the official protocol is that I get it !!!
“THE ENTIRETY” https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#conformance
@grishka @humanetech
No, it would NOT be detrimental to the UX.
This is what Gestalt Principles is about and also my Talk for ActivityPub Conf was about.
This is stealing content and hiding content for the user.
If my friend on software bar decides to send me official type="xy" to my software foo the whole sense of the official protocol is that I get it !!!