Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
dansup

I feel bad that I wasn't able to launch with more projects on FediDB.

Kind of tedious to locate all the metadata we use, maybe I should crowdsource this data to make it easier to add new projects to the fedidb.org/software section 🤔

3 comments
In [[Flancia]] we'll meet

@dansup this looks great, nice to meet you!

I've been searching for such an index of software plus communities/connectivity.

Mike Macgirvin
Had a look a day or two ago and was going to search for the repository and see if I could help out in that respect, but it appears to be proprietary (?).

I'll just mention in passing that I was struck by the extraordinary emphasis of the fedidb site on things that are "popular" and now I notice this emphasis on popularity extends even into the data structures. Since I'm not a Kardashian and don't represent Facebook or Twitter I think I'll just let it pass. This isn't criticism. We just have very different motivations and target audiences.
Had a look a day or two ago and was going to search for the repository and see if I could help out in that respect, but it appears to be proprietary (?).

I'll just mention in passing that I was struck by the extraordinary emphasis of the fedidb site on things that are "popular" and now I notice this emphasis on popularity extends even into the data structures. Since I'm not a Kardashian and don't...
dansup

@mike We do list 60 different ActivityPub implementations in the Network section but I did not have time to collect metadata (project summary, license, website, screenshots, etc) for every one.

I didn't mean to exclude a large number of software projects by virtue of popularity and I'm sorry it came across that way.

Go Up