@cwebber I could. But others have already done so and done well. https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ describes the protocol. The introduction section provides a good description of how the protocol works.
Top-level
@cwebber I could. But others have already done so and done well. https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ describes the protocol. The introduction section provides a good description of how the protocol works. 9 comments
@zepfhyr @DoctorDNS @cwebber I'm pretty, and impressed, that this Christine Lemmer-Webber person was an author and an editor on this document. i personally find it really hard sometimes to edit my own text @meena @zepfhyr @DoctorDNS @cwebber IDK about the W3C process specifically, but a lot of times in these sorts of things, you're getting contributions and input from many different people, so it's up to the editors to pull it all together into a cohesive spec. Think more like the editor of a newspaper, less editor of a book. Yeah, she should just read the spec. I guess she doesn't even know who wrote it. cwebber: "Please, tell me more about how excellent the introduction is" π€©
@DoctorDNS so erm, in danger of getting wooshed: was this post intended to be serious or ironic? |
@DoctorDNS @cwebber Indeed. I feel like the editors on that article really helped the contents flow so they can be better understood. π