I don't understand why people seem to expect that if they sign up here they must get famous instantly or it's a failure of the platform. Did you not spend years growing your network on Twitter?
I don't understand why people seem to expect that if they sign up here they must get famous instantly or it's a failure of the platform. Did you not spend years growing your network on Twitter? 39 comments
Yes hello I would like to inquire about becoming an influencer, thank you, yes I'll hold. ☎️ @Gargron A lot of folks didn't. They made a splash and signed it with their Twitter handle. Instant network. @Gargron "I've escaped all of the nasty algorithms, finally! What, you mean I have do something to find people?!" @Gargron I currently have 324 followers on Mastodon. It took me a little over a year. It took me eight years to get that many followers on Twitter. @Gargron here's the thing, the hasthags in mastodon is kinda sucks. Each instance has different trends. Thank god it's synced in big server, but small server @Gargron you are so correct… but now I can use my Twitter experience to grow here more judiciously… we shall see… @Gargron if the goal is merely to be "famous", Fediverse would not be the place. IMHO @Gargron lf they want to be famous, they should stick to the commercial social sites. I think just being a decent social human is enough to generate clout anywhere, do something the community appreciates: Great content, great discourse, or you can just read the room and find your niche then grown from there. @Gargron I sometimes operate my magazine's Twitter account but usually use Mastodon. The way I think of followers are different on those platforms. With Twitter it's "Ooh look, a follower! How many followers do they have? Will they be awed enough by our follower count if we follow them back? Can I get them to boost my reach somehow?" On Mastodon it's more like "Ooh, a new person? What are they like and what do they do? Are there things we have in common that we can talk about?" @Gargron If there is a downside to the fediverse, it's the ability to discover new people/your contacts to follow; but it's a welcome to sacrifice to keep the quality of the platform high. @Gargron Maybe a bit of it is the fact that Twitter has hit the laggards part of the market, which joined late, but after a large audience was already established. I don't know the answer, but I feel like the profile page on Mastodon is fantastic and in the right direction for that target with its tags, endorsements, and support for multiple links. @Gargron if you are spending time online "growing your network" primarily for the sake of having a large network then you are doing social media wrong TBH @Gargron I have roughly half the followers here as I do on Twitter (it's taken me years to get to 53 there), but I think some of them are bots. No complaints on that end! @Gargron I don't know how to social. I am here to see cool stuff and cool people's projects. |
@Gargron
People do not understand Metcalfe's Law
plus
extremely poor discoverability
equals
"this place kinda sucks doesn't it."