Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
𝗖 𝗔 𝗧

@Sweetbee

I don't think you want to make the rich richer. I never said that. What I think, based on what you've told me, is that you want to maintain the rich's wealth and power over the proletariat, i.e., "No revolution for the working class, you guys! Let's compromise with our oppressors, and maybe they'll be nicer to us if we try hard enough," which I've already explained why that is the worst thing for the working class to do. 4/5

6 comments
𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 replied to 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧

@Sweetbee

I am radical, but not like capitalism, as you blatantly and incorrectly suggested. Capitalism is radical for the continued oppression and subjugation of the working class. I am radical for the opposite: the destruction of capitalist oppression and subjugation and the liberation of the working class. 5/5

Süßes Bienchen replied to 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧

@Radical_EgoCom ja du bist radikal und Radikalismus ist eben Schlecht.
Islam ist ok - Taliban ISIS ist radikal und tΓΆtet Menschen.
Christentum ist ok - KreuzzΓΌge und Missionierungen anders Glaubenden waren Mist.
Jede Form von Extremismus ist nicht gut.
Communismus ist gut gedacht aber schlecht durchgefΓΌhrt worden.
Kapitalismus ist gut fΓΌr die Entwicklung, aber zu viel fordert Opfer.
Merkst du jetzt das du auch falsch liegst.

Denke darΓΌber nach.

@Radical_EgoCom ja du bist radikal und Radikalismus ist eben Schlecht.
Islam ist ok - Taliban ISIS ist radikal und tΓΆtet Menschen.
Christentum ist ok - KreuzzΓΌge und Missionierungen anders Glaubenden waren Mist.
Jede Form von Extremismus ist nicht gut.
Communismus ist gut gedacht aber schlecht durchgefΓΌhrt worden.
Kapitalismus ist gut fΓΌr die Entwicklung, aber zu viel fordert Opfer.
Merkst du jetzt das du auch falsch liegst.

𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 replied to Süßes

@Sweetbee

You're talking as if you're completely disconnected from reality. Just watch the news or go online, and you'll see that the climate crisis and pollution are worse now than ever before. Whether that is because of capitalism or not is up for discussion (I'm of the opinion that it is), but pollution is objectively worse now under capitalism.un.org/en/climatechange/scienc 1/4

𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 replied to 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧

@Sweetbee

And what is this nonsense you're speaking of about "a few people are starving?" A few people? Your definition of "a few" must be skewed. Does 733 million people (1 in 11) sound like "a few people to you? According to "Comcern Worldwide US," that's how many people go hungry every day. 9 million die from hunger every year, many being children under 5. concernusa.org/news/world-hung)%20go%20hungry%20every%20day.
2/4

𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 replied to 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧

@Sweetbee

Also, you didn't prove that radicalism is always bad. Besides me not agreeing with 3 out of 4 of your examples (I don't think Islam or Christianity are okay even when not extreme, Communism has never been implemented, and I don't think every instance of socialism has been poorly executed) you presenting 4 examples of radicalism being bad doesn't prove that radicalism is always bad, only that those 4 examples are bad, which again, 3 out of 4 of which I don't agree with, 3/4

𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 replied to 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧

@Sweetbee

...so no, I don't "realize that I am also wrong" because you didn't present any evidence that I'm wrong. You're the one who needs to think, particularly about the statistics I've sent you. 4/4

Go Up