Gregory's ServerLogic and history dictate that violence will likely be necessary to abolish capitalism. Logically, the capitalist ruling class will use violence of all kinds to prevent capitalisms abolition, which would require the revolutionary class seeking abolition to use violence as well, and historically, the vast majority of revolutions in human history have been violent in some capacity.
|
6 comments
@Radical_EgoCom @bytebro one thing people fail to understand is how violent it is to maintain capitalism. @Radical_EgoCom @Homempovo @bytebro As bloody as dismantling capitalism may be, poverty is a violence that is far bloodier & more deadly. For the many, comrade.  @Radical_EgoCom @bytebro One thing will be certain the greed mongering capitalist will not fight their own war they will be hidden away in their mansions or bunkers.Sooner or later Frankenstein's monster will turn on its master. @Radical_EgoCom @bytebro I voted yes but it's important for me to stress that it should be abolished without being replaced by another oppressive regime/system. I think we should find a way to eliminate social hierarchy at large. I think that the immediate abolition of a hierarchical system is impractical because it will be necessary after the abolition of #capitalism to repress counter-revolution and stop foreign threats. The abolition of all hierarchy should be the ultimate goal for humanity, but its immediate abolition after the abolition of capitalism just wouldn't be practicable. |
@bytebro
Whether it'll be as violent as the French Revolution of 1792 is up for debate, but regardless, the abolition of capitalism will likely be violent.