Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
29 comments
sloot

@bruces
Judging by the transparent bark on the yellow one, I'd guess this is AI generated... which is disappointing because I wish it were real.

Nini

@sloot @bruces No, just seems like the paint layer is somehow being split from the metal sign underneath with the growth so the paint is actually on the top of the bark.

CohenTheBlue

@sloot @bruces oh, it is real. People nail all kinds of trash on living trees >:(

Patch You Up

@sloot @bruces Reverse image search shows it was posted 5 years ago. Either it's real or someone took some time in photoshop. I'd argue the former, as there are similar examples of trees peeling paint off signs in this way.

dynamic_hubzilla
@sloot  @Bruce Sterling @bruces @Derek Caelin is writing a book

For what it's worth, the yellow image was evidently first posted in March 2020: #^https://tineye.com/search/5e53be9cf7b26759e9f9eec9fe43611f42de5f7b?sort=score&order=desc&page=1

That doesn't rule out AI or photoshopping, but I guess it's useful to know.  Unfortunately I wasn't able to find any of those TineEye links that was still live.

What I had initially guessed about that yellow sign was that bits of paint had been lifted by the bark and somehow stayed on the surface as the tree continued to grow, but I don't know enough about bark growth to know if that makes any kind of sense.
crazyeddie

@sloot @bruces This is so the era of bullshit. I know this sort of thing happens so did a search on it just to see and yeah--there's no real telling if any of these are real. Some clearly are not.

Sign that says, "NO BIKES ALLOWED ON TRAILS" being eaten by a camilion tree.
Cavyherd

@crazyeddie @sloot @bruces

Again, I suspect the bark tissue is inserting itself between the inflexible metal of the sign substrate and the more flexible (probably acrylic) layer of the paint.

crazyeddie

@cavyherd @sloot @bruces That's nice. Suspicions are fun things to have. Can never have enough, I always suspected.

pruwyben

@sloot @bruces I'm pretty sure they aren't AI - these images have been around for a while, before AI images were a thing - but I'm not sure if they're real or not.

Cavyherd

@sloot @bruces

I'd actually suspect that the bark has grown in a thin layer inserting in between the substrate and the sign's paint. This actually seems entirely plausible to me, and is somewhat supported by the particular way the image is distorted by the expansion of the bark surface.

Hugo Mills

@bruces Trespassers will be seized by a hedge of thorns and overgrown.

autumn

@bruces
#AltText three different images all showing a tree growing around a "no trespassing" sign that was nailed to it.

Medea Vanamonde🏳️‍⚧️ ♀

@bruces how about stone passing ? Can I pass a kidney stone on these trees?

Gilbert Pilz

@bruces "as I went walking I saw a sign there / and on the sign it said "No Trespassing" / but on the other side it didn't say nothing / that side was made for you and me"

dbat :godot:

@bruces could the tree cells actually pass through the ink and loft it thus?

Lou Thomas

@bruces
As I was walking
I saw a sign there
And on the sign it
Said "No Trespassing"
But on the other side
It didn't say nothing
That side was made for you and me
--Woody Guthrie

√-ʇoɾəuɐnɾ

@bruces How to say “Trespassers will be subsumed” in Entish

erinaceus

@bruces I've seen some people here doubting these signs are real. I can't say if they are, but they do look real enough. For contrast: here is an image of a sign in Labeaume in France (April 2023). Fifteen years ago, it was still mostly visible (and readable) and the pole was still partially visible. Now both sign and pole are barely visible, the sign is not readable, but you can still see where the tree grew around it.

Go Up