29 comments
Again, I suspect the bark tissue is inserting itself between the inflexible metal of the sign substrate and the more flexible (probably acrylic) layer of the paint. I'd actually suspect that the bark has grown in a thin layer inserting in between the substrate and the sign's paint. This actually seems entirely plausible to me, and is somewhat supported by the particular way the image is distorted by the expansion of the bark surface. @bruces "as I went walking I saw a sign there / and on the sign it said "No Trespassing" / but on the other side it didn't say nothing / that side was made for you and me" @bruces @bruces I've seen some people here doubting these signs are real. I can't say if they are, but they do look real enough. For contrast: here is an image of a sign in Labeaume in France (April 2023). Fifteen years ago, it was still mostly visible (and readable) and the pole was still partially visible. Now both sign and pole are barely visible, the sign is not readable, but you can still see where the tree grew around it. |
@bruces
"Nature is healing"™️