Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Preston de Guise

Me: "#Frankenstein ... wow, what a monster."
Them: "That's a popular misconception, Frankenstein was the scientist."
Me: "That's a popular misconception. Frankenstein was the classic #techbro who didn't give a damn about the consequences of what he did and ignored all common ethical considerations. By all reasonable modern-day measures he was indeed the damn monster."

25 comments
jer

@backupbear
Me: There are so many popular misconceptions here. You probably should all go read the book at some point instead of fantasising about it.
Me: [...]
Me: Or even just read a summary of its plot.

Davey

@jerrej @backupbear and the people who have read the book can go and read it too cus it's not that long and it's great every time

Davey

@jerrej @backupbear although I think the game of the pinball table of the film of the book achieved what Shelley really set out to do:

jer

@davey_cakes @backupbear I really should re-read it. It's been thirty years and so much has changed!

int%rmitt]nt sig^al. ...~!...)

@backupbear
Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley would certainly agree with your assessment.
That was the actual point intended by her work.

wakame

@nrmacdonald @backupbear

I think a real techbro Frankenstein wouldn't get sick for half a year because he discovered something like a conscience.

It would be more like "harnessing the power of electricity, every gentleman can now own a mindless slave".

Marty Fouts

@backupbear In the novel Victor did give a damn and cared about the consequences. His one monstrous act was to reject his creation. The image of the mad scientist ignoring consequences was created in the first movie adaptation which is the basis of all other movie adaptations and spin offs.

Sepia Fan

@MartyFouts
From chapter 5: "The different accidents of life are not so changeable as the feelings of human nature. I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body. For this I had deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart."
From hubris to self-pity in one paragraph.
@backupbear

Marty Fouts

@stekopf @backupbear Yes. Thatโ€™s the start of the rejection. The climax is when the creature tells Victor that Victor should think of the creature as Adam, but sees him as Lucifer. (Another deviation in the movie was to make the creature mute rather than articulate.)

Hugo Slabbert โš ๏ธ

@backupbear yup; there is a reason she called it The Modern Prometheus.

kaaswe

@backupbear sounds like a description of E Musk

wrath0110

@backupbear This is the flaw in reading literature from prior periods while employing a lens of modern values... You might reach the correct interpretation, however it's likely you will just not understand what the author was aiming at.

Psyvacy

@backupbear Or:

"No. It's not a common misconception, people use the name for the monster, which means that is in fact the name of the monster as well as the creator because that's how names work.

Also everyone hates you and you'll die alone unless you stop with these petty uninteresting "corrections"."

(Talking to the person in the hypothetical, not any actually real person. Obviously. That would be insanely rude.)

Bryan Redeagle

@backupbear It's not Frankenstein. It's "Fronkensteen".

Dave "Wear A Goddamn Mask" Cochran :donor:

@backupbear Intelligence is knowing Frankenstein wasn't the monster. Wisdom is knowing Frankenstein was the monster.

Anjune

@backupbear He was absolutely wracked with guilt and made it his lifeโ€™s mission to hunt down his creationโ€ฆ

WesDym

@backupbear On old saying I'm fond of: Knowledge is knowing that Frankenstein is not the monster. Wisdom is knowing that Frankenstein IS the monster.

Go Up