Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Drew DeVault

"Richard Stallman's problematic behavior, particularly with respect to his views on sexual harassment, sexual assault, and sexualizing minors, are best explained by his (supposed) neurodivergence, and to call for his censure on this basis is discriminatory and ableist"

I've heard this argument (paraphrased) many times. Neurodivergent folks on fedi: can you chime in with your thoughts? Please refrain from replying if you do not have a personal experience with neurodiversity.

70 comments
Drew DeVault

Also, while I have your attention, do you feel that terms "neurodiverse", "neurodivergent", and "neurotypical" are the most appropriate contemporary vocabulary for this discourse?

Drew DeVault

Also is there a -phobia sort of word for fear or hatred towards neurodivergence

Drew DeVault

If no one offers a better term I'm going to coin the word "neurotypicalism"

Drew DeVault

Another question to stimulate discussion:

If we take at face value that sexist and problematic behavior in FOSS is, at least partially, explained by a high incidence of neurodivergence in this community, and it's ableist to condemn behavior which is explainable by neurodivergence: is avoiding such criticism and censure on this basis putting the comfort of neurodivergent participants ahead of the comfort of women in our spaces, and if so, is that appropriate?

Jonathan Cremin

@drewdevault isn't that a twist on the tolerant of intolerance paradox?

Jonathan Cremin

@drewdevault isn't that a twist on the tolerant of intolerance paradox?

Drew DeVault

One more note: I will be drawing from this discussion in future writings. I will assume that anyone participating is comfortable being anonymously paraphrased, if you are comfortable being quoted verbatim or being cited as the source of a quote please let me know (bearing in mind that this is going to open you up to a lot of reactionary abuse)

Drew DeVault

Neurodivergent members of the free software community: what are some forms of discrimination and ableism that you have experienced in our community? What are some steps that have helped, or could help, ease your participation?

Urzl

@drewdevault Neurodivergence typically means you have different impulses and thresholds. It doesn't mean you're incapable of learning civilized behavior even if it does make you uncomfortable fitting that mold.

Short of something like Tourettes, there's very little that *makes you* do something inappropriate or insensitive and even when all else fails, apologies are still available to all.

ttamttam

@drewdevault honestly not much. IMO women have it way worse.
Most I can think of is one person insisted on calling me mentally ill when they learned I had autism. They got banned very quickly once it was clear it wasn't just an honest mistake (I.e. we tried explaining *why* you shouldn't do that). So I guess that's the step that helps most.
But that's just a thing that happened once. I wouldn't call it pervasive, at least not in the communities that I'm in.

Phil M0OFX

@drewdevault Mostly it's been accusations of incompetence related to my neurospiciness. Sometimes it took the form of people accusing me of lying for sympathy, or to cover up a more serious mental illness. The worst was people deliberately engineering stressful situations which caused me to react badly - screenshotting that, and spreading it around with false context.

What could have helped? Some backup from my "peers". In nearly every case, bystander syndrome kicked in. "Not my drama" etc.

Botch Frivarg

@drewdevault as someone who is fairly good at masking I don't encounter a lot of direct ableism (or discrimination), and when it is there it is often much more in from the mainstream side of things. It is in all the little assumptions (e.g. the whole "autistic people are tricked into being trans" bullshit), in a way it is not to dissimilar to being left handed in our society, so many things are made with the assumption it will be used with a right hand like from scissors, to powertools, and even things like knives! In the same way a lot of things in our society assume neurotypical, from the way we do schooling, to job application, even leisure activities, or just general socializing (the lack of third places is a real thing, but for autistic people it is often double due to how the third places still available don't cater to use at all)

@drewdevault as someone who is fairly good at masking I don't encounter a lot of direct ableism (or discrimination), and when it is there it is often much more in from the mainstream side of things. It is in all the little assumptions (e.g. the whole "autistic people are tricked into being trans" bullshit), in a way it is not to dissimilar to being left handed in our society, so many things are made with the assumption it will be used with a right hand like from scissors, to powertools, and even...

Kat

@drewdevault You can quote me verbatim. Anybody who doesn't like what I said can bite my shiny metal ass.

✨🏳️‍⚧️Timelordiroh :she_her:🇵🇸

@drewdevault being neurodivergent is no excuse for creating a hostile environment. People using that as a crutch/excuse are harmful to neurodivergent people. It is the responsibility of everyone to make sure they create a welcoming environment and call out anyone who isn't doing their part.

(I'm autistic, ADHD, probably a little dyslexic. None of those give me any excuse.)

Maxi 10x 💉

@drewdevault Absolutely NO! In my eyes, it’s also not ableist to criticize such behaviors like RMS’.
Look, I think it’s fair to assume a high neurodiverse ratio in the FLOSS community, probably way above 50%. Chances are, you are actually part of this side too, without knowing. Being neurodivergent doesn’t have to be linked to being an asshole, that’s just an excuse of his fans. He repeatedly decides to be this guy.

Botch Frivarg

@drewdevault I would say no, but that is in context of fundamentally disagreeing with the premise, something can be an explanation without being an excuse (and that is assuming the problematic behavior is due to neurodivergence), so condemning problematic behavior even in neurodivergent people isn't ableist. That said, in some context the way neurodivergent people are called out is ableist (especially for younger individuals who grew up sheltered, and so might not realize what they where doing wrong), but in that case we can condemn both the callout and the initial behavoir.

@drewdevault I would say no, but that is in context of fundamentally disagreeing with the premise, something can be an explanation without being an excuse (and that is assuming the problematic behavior is due to neurodivergence), so condemning problematic behavior even in neurodivergent people isn't ableist. That said, in some context the way neurodivergent people are called out is ableist (especially for younger individuals who grew up sheltered, and so might not realize what they where doing wrong),...

Mark Shane Hayden

@drewdevault suggesting that the comfort and safety of women must be compromised to accommodate ND people is a pretty messed up take. Calling out inappropriate behaviour of a ND person, when done appropriately and offering help to resolve the situation, *is* being supportive of ND people as well as others.

Unfortunately what happens all too often is that the toxic person in question refuses to acknowledge what they are doing is wrong and is unwilling to improve the situation and uses this "ableism" argument as an excuse to do so. This is BS. If a sociopath kills someone they still go to jail to be separated from society to protect us from harm, and hopefully undergo some degree of rehabilitation. Perhaps it is an extreme comparison but the same logic holds true here.

We cannot provide a safe environment by excusing toxic behaviour from *anyone*. When that behaviour comes from a ND person it means we may have to address things differently but they still have to be addressed.

@drewdevault suggesting that the comfort and safety of women must be compromised to accommodate ND people is a pretty messed up take. Calling out inappropriate behaviour of a ND person, when done appropriately and offering help to resolve the situation, *is* being supportive of ND people as well as others.

Ignacio Torres

@drewdevault as an undiagnosed autistic/asperger parent of diagnosed autistic/asperger kids:

Being autistic is not an excuse for repeated misbehaviour.

If I have difficulties reading other people I can err on the safe side to avoid harming them. In my experience it's what most of us do and why we pass as shy.

Deciding to "risk it" for personal gain is being an asshole or a potential abuser.

Many of us have acted as assholes and learned from it.

You can quote me verbatim as the source.

fr0g

@drewdevault

"and it's ableist to condemn behavior which is explainable by neurodivergence"

I feel like there might be some nuance lacking here. Harmful behaviour is harmful behaviour and thus worth of condemnation to some degree imo. The main difference should maybe rather be about how much blame we do or do not cast on the actor.

Akseli :quake_verified:​ :kde:

@drewdevault

I have ADHD and autism, heres my thoughts.

if i am making someone uncomfortable, i want people to tell me that.

Sure, i will feel bad. But i dont want to hurt anyone either. But i also expect some understanding in return.

I dont think expecting mutual respect is ableism. Ableism would be going more like "they can never behave 'properly' because of their brains work like that."

This is a bit hard to explain but: I like to imagine theres is a "wall of respect" between two people. If the wall is broken by either party, the other side will feel slighted.

but this wall isnt made our of bricks. Its more a rubber band. It needs to be able to bend both ways. Pushed too far it will snap and someone gets hurt. And the tolerances are different for everyone.

@drewdevault

I have ADHD and autism, heres my thoughts.

if i am making someone uncomfortable, i want people to tell me that.

Sure, i will feel bad. But i dont want to hurt anyone either. But i also expect some understanding in return.

I dont think expecting mutual respect is ableism. Ableism would be going more like "they can never behave 'properly' because of their brains work like that."

Edward L Platt

@drewdevault part of being a community leader is being sensitive to how one's actions will be perceived. This can be more difficult for some neurodivergent people, but it is often still possible. If a leader can't do that, it is, as the kids say, a skill issue, even if different neurotypes rely on different skills to achieve it.

PuddleOfKittens

@drewdevault this is kind of like discussions on corporations: either you're held to moral responsibilities, or you're muzzled for the safety of others because you can't/won't restrain yourself. To permit someone to join your community is to assume they're at least capable of learning how to follow the rules, if they don't know yet. Ignoring their rule-breaking outright won't help them learn, so criticism/explaining is usually the appropriate response.

"Neurodivergent" is a broad term though.

Phil M0OFX

@drewdevault That "at face value" is carrying a lot of weight. I'd rather not set a pecking order, but I feel like women, POC/non-white, trans people, etc. probably get it a lot worse. (Maybe they don't. I have no data)
I think the comfort of everyone needs to be on an equal footing, and there are some very hard rules, for good reason.
Like if you had a friend who disliked deodorant - they don't get a free pass on "have good hygeine", but maybe they shower before turning up to social events.

ttamttam

@drewdevault
*if* we accept the predicate of your hypothetical that it is ableist to condemn behavior explainable by neurodivergence (which I don't and I doubt you do either). The answer to me is: be ableist. I don't like it, but it's ridiculous to imagine any other option in the physical world, and it's weird to treat the virtual world so differently.
1/3

Kat

@drewdevault So here's a thing, based on multiple run-ins with this.

More likely than not any given person who comes out with that, will also trot out the line about autistic* people being more rational than allistics.
If you're hearing echoes of "I'm too intelligent to be sexist/racist" here, so am I.

But if you present these same guys (and they're almost always male) with the argument that diversity in a community, especially a technical one, always leads to a stronger community, pay attention to how rational the response is. You'll encounter plenty of rationalising, but very little that's rational.

Never mind "appropriate" IMO. Is it a good idea on any measure other than the comfort of fragile white guys?

If I sound a little cranky about this subject, it's because I'm sick to death of being painted with that brush.

*Yes, I know there are more kinds than this. However, it's the one most often held up as a shield IME.

@drewdevault So here's a thing, based on multiple run-ins with this.

More likely than not any given person who comes out with that, will also trot out the line about autistic* people being more rational than allistics.
If you're hearing echoes of "I'm too intelligent to be sexist/racist" here, so am I.

echarlie

@drewdevault I'll take at face value that problematic behaviour can be explained by neurodivergence (mislearned social norms, poor restraint, issues with boundaries, etc...). But I'd argue that it's even *more important* to call people out for shitty behaviour, because they may not be aware of it!

But we need to show care in how we call out that behaviour: doubling-down is a very human reaction, because learning and growth is scary. People will respond better if shown mutual respect and trust.

prasoon

@drewdevault
Conflating the two is problematic. I've been misunderstood at work because I sometimes fail to place people's emotions in context when offering a critique. But, I've also made an effort to apologise when I gauged that I was harsh, explaining why I did what I did, and sitting down together to work out a way to work around my inability to understand emotions. Working out a solution is important. Using it as an excuse is simply bad behaviour.

:neuro: Antonius Marie ⚧

@drewdevault (sorry, just that each of these required their own answer >.>)

Is being ND an explanation for being sexist or any other type of -ist? No. Being ND is a good explanation for why one might not realise how inappropriate it is to say certain things (some of which are appropriate in other contexts, others that are never appropriate) ... but sexism/racism/queermisia *are not mental conditions/illnesses*. They're learned values (whether consciously or not), and it's absolute bullshit to go "we can't call out him for being a predator, that's _ableist_!" when they're quite happy to sacrifice me and others because we made the silly mistake to not be born as white men.

@drewdevault (sorry, just that each of these required their own answer >.>)

Is being ND an explanation for being sexist or any other type of -ist? No. Being ND is a good explanation for why one might not realise how inappropriate it is to say certain things (some of which are appropriate in other contexts, others that are never appropriate) ... but sexism/racism/queermisia *are not mental conditions/illnesses*. They're learned values (whether consciously or not), and it's absolute bullshit to go...

Omar Jarjur

@drewdevault The key concept in accessibility is *reasonable* accommodations.

No one deserves to be accommodated if that accommodation compromises the safety of someone else.

therainingmonkey

@drewdevault
IMO intentions count.

We live in a sexist and problematic society, so we're bound to experience some problematic behaviour whenever we interact with wider society. One way we begin to change that society is by gently explaining why behaviours are problematic and how to avoid repeating them.

Of course this is futile when you encounter the kind of goblin who deliberately hurts others for attention. Proof of intentions is in actions; if behaviour improves they deserve patience IMO

@drewdevault
IMO intentions count.

We live in a sexist and problematic society, so we're bound to experience some problematic behaviour whenever we interact with wider society. One way we begin to change that society is by gently explaining why behaviours are problematic and how to avoid repeating them.

josh susser

@drewdevault I have been using the word "neurosupremacy" for a while. I think it does a better job of capturing the extreme power imbalance and abusively oppressive nature of things than a simple -ism does. Similar terms seen: the Stimpunks Foundation uses the word "neurocentrism", and recently YouTuber ProudlyAutistic coined "neuroism". I think there's room for more than one term because there are subtle differences, but also I'd like to see some convergence.

GinevraCat

@drewdevault Yes, many. But I can't type those words in a public forum. 🤦

Phil M0OFX

@drewdevault Ableism is the word I've heard most commonly associated with such things. I'd draw a line between fear or misunderstanding and hatred though: the first is a mistake (and people doing it are often willing to learn); The second is active malice. It's probably only fair to describe the latter case as ableism or discrimination.

:neuro: Antonius Marie ⚧

@drewdevault For the "term for fear/hatred" ... Well, sanism/sanist is a term I've heard, though it might not be fitting for "against the entire spectrum of neurodivergence". Neurotypicalism is a perfect word for the situation where (in a different situation) sexism would be used, IMHO

Phil M0OFX

@drewdevault I usually go with "neurospicy" but honestly it's up to everyone to pick the label they prefer (or no label).

:neuro: Antonius Marie ⚧

@drewdevault My stance is that a person is neurodivergent (or possibly neurotypical), and a group with several neurotypes (say five people: two's autistic, two have ADHD (one of them is also autistic), one has PTSD and the fifth is neurotypical; that's a neurodiverse group; a group of five autistic-but-nothing-else is not)

With the addition that the term for "not autistic" is "allistic", but that allistic and neurotypical are not synonyms (the aforementioned person with PTSD is neurodivergent but not autistic, so neurodiveregent and allistic).

Because to me, it's important to be able to have a name for what you are, but also important to have an umbrella term (for me the "name" is autistic, with the umbrella term of neurodivergent).

there can be a argument made for "no one's neurotypical", but a person who isn't autistic, doesn't have ADHD or any recognisable (diagnosed or not) mental health things ... has a leg up in society on those of us that are in the neurodivergent bucket.

@drewdevault My stance is that a person is neurodivergent (or possibly neurotypical), and a group with several neurotypes (say five people: two's autistic, two have ADHD (one of them is also autistic), one has PTSD and the fifth is neurotypical; that's a neurodiverse group; a group of five autistic-but-nothing-else is not)

Thomas Haeberlen

@drewdevault FWIW I prefer "neurodiverse" over "neurodivergent" because I feel that the latter has a distinctively negative undertone, but I can live with the "neurodiverse" <> "neurotypical" pair.

Leather Cub Andrew Aû

@drewdevault
"neurodivergent" yes
"neurodiverse" not exactly
"neurotypical" definitely

PuddleOfKittens

@drewdevault neurodiversity is orthogonal to being an asshole. I learned that the hard way, be very careful not to excuse all asshole-ish behaviour with "it's just their mental problems", or they'll use it against you and you'll end up stepping on the rusty nails they left pointing face-up on the living-room floor you both frequently walk through barefoot despite you SPECIFICALLY telling them not to, and then they'll try to gaslight you and act like you're crazy.

Peter Bindels

@drewdevault That argument makes about as much sense as "I am in a wheelchair therefore I deserve to beat up others with a stick".

Mark Shane Hayden

@drewdevault I think that this argument borders on being offensive to neurodivergent people. It suggests that ND people can't help themselves or strive to improve and correct harmful behaviour. Whether the people making such a statement intend to or not it suggests they view ND people as forever something like a child or pet, but maybe worse because even children and pets can learn from mistakes.

Botch Frivarg

@drewdevault as an actual autistic and (self diagnosed) ADHD person I say that doesn't excuse shitty behavior in some contexts it might explain it, but even then if the behavior continues after a clear explanation on why it was shitty that is on the individual. So no calling out Mr. Stallman for his shitty behavior is neither discriminatory nor ableist, he had plenty of time and explanations already

Huubje

@drewdevault while it doesn't excuse behaviour, I think it does grant people a do-over if they fuck up and apologise. Stallman apologised and admitted he was wrong, so for me that's enough.

Drew DeVault

@Huubje he didn't actually meaningfully apologize, and, importantly, did not change his behavior

bram dingelstad :nb_flag:

@drewdevault i'm neurodivergent, his behaviour is not related or relevant in the context of neurodiversity

problematic behaviour is what it is: problematic.

there are a lot of neurodivergent people out there that are able to carry themselves in a way that doesn't make anyone unsafe or harm victims of sexual assault.

making neurodivergence an excuse for this behaviour only worsens the perception of neurodiversity in my opinion.

Richard Stallman should be held accountable, regardless

Drew DeVault

@bram I've quoted you in the draft

Please let me know if you're okay with how I've paraphrased you here :)

bram dingelstad :nb_flag:

@drewdevault yeah maybe it's worth adding some more context to "or harm victims of sexual assault." into "harm victims of sexual assault by discussing their lived experience in a harmful way"

and "Richard Stallman should be held accountable." into "Richard Stallman should be held accountable for his opinions and actions"

that way it seems a bit less like im literally alleging him of assault, dont wanna get a lawsuit on my ass haha

but the point still remains what i want it to be ✨

William Pietri

@drewdevault My first question: Who are you and what are you doing? I see no bio here or on your website, and you open with enraging horseshit. What makes this worth someone's time?

Blain Smith

@drewdevault Being neurodivergent is no excuse for behavior like that. We all live in the same society to treat each other with respect and while those social contracts might be harder for others to remember/grasp it does not excuse their behavior.

Context: I'm autistic and have an autistic 11 year old boy. I try to teach him respect for his fellow humans moreso than most other things. The stakes are MUCH higher for him if he forgets those contracts, even for a moment in the wrong setting.

River Tae Smith (he/him)

@drewdevault It feels like there are a lot of different things this type of defense implies (presumably intentionally).

If they're saying "Richard is ND and therefore has a different idea of appropriate sexual behaviour", then he can learn. If they're saying "Richard is ND and therefore cannot behave appropriately", then I think this is just not true (of ND people in general but also specifically Richard) and anyway it means he just can't be in a position of power safely, no matter why.

Jez 🍞🌹

@drewdevault This view of neurodivergence as meaning we aren't responsible for the consequences of our actions is incredibly infantilising. It harms all of us because it justifies denying our agency.

It also trivialises the huge amount of energy many of us put into hiding the facets of our personalities that NTs find uncomfortable but actually harm no-one.

Esther Payne :bisexual_flag:

@drewdevault the thing with RMS is that there were people around him, some who didn't call him out.

But some folks in his circles did tell him his behaviour was problematic. But he didn't feel inclined to listen to them.

It took major public attention to even get an apology. That behaviour over years helped to contribute to the attitude in Free Software.

But that attitude isn't unique to tech.

Neuro divergence isn't an excuse for abusive behaviour. Especially when it's doubled down on.

Tab :godot: :git: :linux:

@drewdevault I consider myself neurodivergent but not a psychologist so this is my uninformed opinion. (Edit, didn't include "not")

Seems reasonable that having thought processes different from the norm leads to different intuition, and different life experiences (sheltered) which lead to different beliefs.

As I understood these are now his former beliefs.

ttamttam

@drewdevault
As someone who is neurodivergent, RMS can completely fuck off.
One thing worth noting is that sometimes the least accepting/accommodating people are other neurodivergent people. After all, I managed to surpass these issues, so why can't you? TBH it took me awhile to notice the behavior in myself and start to correct it. However, I just can't square that with how much of an asshole RMS is.
1/...

Eduardo Padoan @ work :tw:

@drewdevault this argument would mean that our neurodivergency is completely determinant on our thoughts and opinions and that we have zero agency, but also that those shitty opinions are somehow inherent for people with his (supposed) neurodivergent status which makes no sense

Jens Finkhäuser

@drewdevault Well, I guess this is as good a time as any to "come out": turns out I'm neurospicy as fuck (TL;DR). I mean, I haven't been hiding it.

Can Stallman's behavior be explained by his being neurodivergent? Yes and no.

Yes, sometimes he writes things that are brutally logical in a particular way that seems very neurodivergent to me, and which also manages to stomp all over people's sensibilities in exactly the way NT folk use to claim we can't read or even experience emotions. 1/n

Ásthar (Elle/They) ⛤

@drewdevault As a neurodivergent person myself, you lost me in the first bit, so I'm going to ask: in which way does neurodivergence explain his harmful behaviours?

Drew DeVault

@asthargf it doesn't, but I stated the argument at face value to avoid colouring the discussion

Phil M0OFX

@drewdevault Sure. I'd rather like him to stop using neurodivergence as an excuse for his paedophilia and any other paraphilias he might have. I'm a nearly-40-year-old neurodivergent and have no issues with consent, or the age thereof. RMS needs to get help to deal with these issues, not use legitimate conditions to legitimise his.

Drew DeVault

Reply to this post if you're ND and want to help review the draft of this blog post

ttamttam

@drewdevault I doubt you'll be hurting for white male autistic ND people but if you need another I'd be happy to review. It might be worth actively seeking out ND people who fall into less represented subcategories, or who have more intersectionality going on than I do.

Kit, local computer gremlin

@drewdevault Enby neurodivergent here (autistic as all hell), frankly with neurodivergence the best way to address it is to give a chance to back out, to not double down, which stallman has been given many times.

Giving an explanation of why [problematic behavior] is wrong and then a chance to back down and correct is the approach I advise.

That being said, stallman has continually refused to correct himself on the problematic behaviors he’s been called out on, so more drastic action is necessary, exactly as you’ve been advocating for.

@drewdevault Enby neurodivergent here (autistic as all hell), frankly with neurodivergence the best way to address it is to give a chance to back out, to not double down, which stallman has been given many times.

Giving an explanation of why [problematic behavior] is wrong and then a chance to back down and correct is the approach I advise.

Patch Arcana

@drewdevault I agree with what seems to be the growing consensus: it's actually more ableist to determine all of someone's misbehaviours are down to their neurodiversity/neurodivergence.

If I believed in neurodivergent-determinalism, I'd have no choice but to be the moody, volatile, "random", and generally assinine character I spent my teens cementing in everyone's mind and my 20s and 30s deconstructing.

Kat

@drewdevault
Executive summary: it's bullshit. Ostracise him already.

Longer version: It's simply not true, and it's throwing neurodivergent people under the bus by painting us all as irredeemably sexist/misogynist.

It's also trying to make excuses for him ("look, the poor dear simply can't help it!") and is a short hop from "he's not really racist, he was just drunk/on strong medication."

If there were a clear and well-documented trail of records showing that neurodivergence is strongly associated with such attitudes and/or behaviours, there might be a case for it. I've yet to hear of such evidence, and I'd be deeply suspicious of the methodology used to gather it.

Being autistic hasn't caused me to be a sex-pest any more than getting drunk has ever suddenly made me racist.

No, RMS' problematic behaviour is his own responsibility, and to call for censure on this basis is the correct course of action.
Not just censure of him, but of everybody running interference for him.

@drewdevault
Executive summary: it's bullshit. Ostracise him already.

Longer version: It's simply not true, and it's throwing neurodivergent people under the bus by painting us all as irredeemably sexist/misogynist.

It's also trying to make excuses for him ("look, the poor dear simply can't help it!") and is a short hop from "he's not really racist, he was just drunk/on strong medication."

Drew DeVault

Okay, I think the article is almost ready

Leather Cub Andrew Aû

@drewdevault from my point of view, I do believe that some of that person's nerurodivergence can come into play with that, however, a bigger chunk is most likely associated with upbringing... the whole nature vs nurture thing. I believe that there's interplay and sometimes people need to take the time to unlearn what was erroneously taught to them either through trauma or a harmful authority figure who most likely wasn't neurodivergent.

Go Up