|
Top-level
 @apicultor @EUCommission I don't see it as an important thing. I answered in another reply but since people absolutely hate "read the other comment" phrases, it's unethical in the same way as microchiping a human but it's only if you support animal rights. 5 comments
@GolfNovemberUniform @apicultor @EUCommission They differs first of all in their behavior: a cat or a dog can escape more easily then an human baby or an human that understand he shouldn't go around. Chips help to bring a pet that has being lost to be found. (sorry for bad english) It's better to have a way to get them back at home then crying because we lost them.  @GolfNovemberUniform @Axusse @apicultor @EUCommission cats loosing metal plates exist too. @canleaf @Axusse @apicultor @EUCommission sure but it's a more complicated matter. |
Gregory's Server
@GolfNovemberUniform @apicultor @EUCommission Well I consider myself antispeciesist, but I don't think applying a chip to an human is the same to applying it to an animal.
I'll explain why: besides I agree with the fact that animals should be considered more in their right to live and in their right to be and express themselves. I think the chip is necessary because they are, anyways, different from an human baby or an human in general. (part 1/2)