I partly got the impression for the JSO 4 year terms was decided on their behaviour in court too. So not just for planning to disrupt the motor way but they were also contempt of court.
Top-level
I partly got the impression for the JSO 4 year terms was decided on their behaviour in court too. So not just for planning to disrupt the motor way but they were also contempt of court. 4 comments
@zleap @kim_harding they weren’t sentenced for contempt as such, if I’ve understood correctly, but the judge said he was taking their disruption of proceedings into account when passing his outrageous sentences @Simon318ppm @zleap So they got stiffer sentences because they didn't have professional legal representation? That is not a fair trial, then. Remember that the previous UK government wanted to remove the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights. Maybe you are happy to see the UK slide into autocracy, I am not. |
@zleap Where did you get that impression from?
Here is some background to what is going on https://theconversation.com/just-stop-oils-harsh-sentences-are-the-logical-outcome-of-britains-authoritarian-turn-against-protest-235148
Also, a UN representative believes may “violate the UK’s obligations under international human rights law”. https://bylinetimes.com/2024/07/18/just-stop-oil-sentencing-m25/