Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
HP van Braam :verified:

@forestjohnson @vkc I'm not disagreeing with you that something needs to change!

But what hasn't worked out super well in the past are things like webmin or YaST, they tended to break systems if you looked at them wrong.

I don't think the solution is to make it unnecessary to understand the systems, that has never worked.

I think it would be way more valuable to make good resources for people to understand the systems so they can make their own choices about their systems.

9 comments
Forest

@hp @vkc

Yep, and SSH/GNU has to go in order to achieve that goal.

HP van Braam :verified:

@forestjohnson @vkc What does GNU have to do with anything? I'm very confused.

You mean, text based interfaces?

Forest

@hp @vkc

The GNU suite of userland applications that we rely on for linux server administration, plus Systemd. They're great, buuuutt... They dont have any affordances, so they are a major no-go for the general public.

I think a replacement is in order. -- something that is readily available on every platform (iOS, Android, Windows, Mac), something that can list processes, list systemd service units, list docker containers.. do all the other CRUD operations on those, all the while offering commonly-legible affordances (not a manual that starts with "how to read this manual", but instead an explore-able UI that "shows and tells" instead of demanding that the user already becomes an expert before they use it)

We won't get anywhere until this kind of thing exists.. People aren't going to, en masse, wake up on day, find a $30,000 gold nugget under their couch to support themselves for the next year, and then think, hmm, you know what I should really spend my time on??? Reading through the linux man pages 10 times.

@hp @vkc

The GNU suite of userland applications that we rely on for linux server administration, plus Systemd. They're great, buuuutt... They dont have any affordances, so they are a major no-go for the general public.

I think a replacement is in order. -- something that is readily available on every platform (iOS, Android, Windows, Mac), something that can list processes, list systemd service units, list docker containers.. do all the other CRUD operations on those, all the while offering commonly-legible...

Forest

@hp @vkc

I did linux servers for 8 years before i knew that the different numbers on the man pages were a secret code that had a concrete meaning for what kind of man page it is. Give me fucking break.

HP van Braam :verified: replied to Forest

@forestjohnson I think that's fair to a point. But nobody has come close to doing anything like that.

Netware was kinda easy, in that respect, but it also couldn't do a great deal.

Windows is fine until something goes wrong. Then the difficulty curve becomes a cliff because it won't ever tell you anything useful. If you encounter a problem for the first time on Windows you have to go ask someone.

On Linux, at least, once you have a base set of knowledge you can mostly figure things out.

HP van Braam :verified: replied to HP van Braam :verified:

@forestjohnson That's not to say that things are great now. Not at all.

I'm just trying to say that the problem is large to the point where it seems that nobody has ever even TRIED to fix it.

Forest replied to HP van Braam :verified:

@hp Yeah, that's what I'm saying, nobody has done it yet. But that doesn't mean its impossible. Windows is absolutely not the way, but I do believe that a well-documented HTTP-based UI for linux, systemd, and docker, could potentially be a home run.

It would have to include the linux installer too, including managing the installation from a phone, so you don't have to plug a kbd and mouse into the server.

HP van Braam :verified: replied to Forest

@forestjohnson I'm mostly wondering how to preserve the "useful errors that will tell you what went wrong."

I've never seen that done in anything GUI-like, other than just stuffing a log-file into a textbox. And at that point it'd be better to be able to run grep on it, or find all logs around the same time on the system...

How do you give a novice user information like "This violated an SELinux policy" and let them fix it, without making it easy to accidentally allow an exploit to run.

Forest replied to HP van Braam :verified:

@hp

> How do you give a novice user information like "This violated an SELinux policy"

1. disable SELinux

2. If you want to enable SELinux, you have to make a GUI for it -- you have to actually go into the SELinux source code and add the parts that will enable actual usability. Not to create a shitty error message like "This violated an SELinux policy", but to create an error message that contains the word "because".

------------------------

.. nobody has ever even TRIED to fix it.

Nobody ever tried to fix climate change either... But if we don't fix it, it's all over real quick.

I believe in an interpretation of what we observe about the universe that says that "what we observe is generally what was most likely to happen". aka "many worlds"

In a thousand years, the only likely outcome that anyone will be around to observe, is the outcome where we got thru it...

I took a heroic dose of psychedelics and saw the Golden Path, so I'm trying to walk it. Succeed or fail, don't care, at least I tried and did my best. Sue me.

@hp

> How do you give a novice user information like "This violated an SELinux policy"

1. disable SELinux

2. If you want to enable SELinux, you have to make a GUI for it -- you have to actually go into the SELinux source code and add the parts that will enable actual usability. Not to create a shitty error message like "This violated an SELinux policy", but to create an error message that contains the word "because".

Go Up