Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
David's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
Ryan Fisher

@brhfl
@sertaptap @davidgerard

Well ... A "writing assistant" is what an LLM is, no?

19 July at 0:46 | Wall-to-wall | Open on infosec.exchange
4 comments
bri

@wryanfisher @sertaptap @davidgerard yes and only 29% of respondents gave a shit despite the entire survey being geared around it.

19 July at 0:47 | Open on digipres.club
Ryan Fisher

@brhfl
@sertaptap @davidgerard

The two blog posts by the actual ML head at Proton seem a bit more circumspect than the hype.

I thought the post on using LLMs in a privacy-focused design was at least thoughtful and had a lot of interesting information in it.
proton.me/blog/how-to-build-pr

The announcement post on Scribe does point out that the whole thing can be run local etc. It also seems likely they are trying to work out the future of the product with some of the more advanced privacy ideas like homomorphic encryption (an idea which still hurts my brain).
proton.me/blog/proton-scribe-w

@brhfl
@sertaptap @davidgerard

The two blog posts by the actual ML head at Proton seem a bit more circumspect than the hype.

I thought the post on using LLMs in a privacy-focused design was at least thoughtful and had a lot of interesting information in it.
proton.me/blog/how-to-build-pr

19 July at 1:33 | Open on infosec.exchange
bri

@wryanfisher my takeaway was more 'damn that's a lot of resources spent on something less than a third of your customers give a shit about' but w/e. was just here to relay the survey info, i already know i'm not giving them any more of my money.

19 July at 1:42 | Open on digipres.club
Ryan Fisher

@brhfl

I think that's a totally fair reaction.

I feel like the opt-in affirmative action to enable it on a per use basis mitigates a lot of the privacy issues for me, though. For the writing assistant, at least. The LLM is not training itself on your mail corpus I don't think.

19 July at 5:49 | Open on infosec.exchange
Go Up