@kristoff that's significantly outside the scope of the chatcontrol legislation I was talking about, but I'll weigh in anyway.
In the US (and a few other places) there was a big deal made about tiktok as a source of foreign spying and manipulation. The US could, in theory, deal with surveillance with a federal privacy law, but that would also affect their domestic avenues for spying (alphabet, meta, etc.).
Australia's privacy commissioner found that tiktok was not in violation of any privacy laws[1], for instance, and that they might want to consider stronger privacy laws.
Instances of banning foreign actors tend to relate more to xenophobia than interest in domestic citizens' well-being.
[1]: https://www.oaic.gov.au/newsroom/statement-on-tiktok-preliminary-inquiries
@ansuz I have a different opinion on that. Why are a lot of randsom-gangs from Russia, a country where things only happen because the gouvernement allows it to happen.
How do you deal with mallware that use Telegram to connect to the command-and-control server as it is encrypted, it hides nicely in the noise of the legimate traffic and -as part of the telegram master-key is in Russia- ?
There is now a saying:
"telegram is the new dark web".
Why is that?
How do you deal with that?
@ansuz I have a different opinion on that. Why are a lot of randsom-gangs from Russia, a country where things only happen because the gouvernement allows it to happen.
How do you deal with mallware that use Telegram to connect to the command-and-control server as it is encrypted, it hides nicely in the noise of the legimate traffic and -as part of the telegram master-key is in Russia- ?