parts of the European government are gearing up to push through their "ChatControl" surveillance legislation.
I don't want to ignore this, but it feels like most of the people that follow me have already heard all about it. Maybe I'd be better off spending my time and energy on other stuff.
It was nearly two years ago that I wrote this article[1] about the EU #ChatControl surveillance directive on behalf of the @cryptpad team.
Very little has changed since then. Experts in technology, law, and policy all agree that the proposal undermines basic European rights, that it will be abused by authoritarian member states, and that the proposed tech solutions cannot possibly do the job the supporting legislators have claimed.
Nevertheless, they have persisted, claiming the support of "expert testimony" that overwhelmingly consists of unsupported claims by lobbyists associated with law enforcement and defense contractors who stand to benefit financially from its implementation.
A vote is expected to take place on June 19th. These have been scheduled and delayed multiple times already, but this it feels like they might get away with it. There is a lot going on in the EU at the moment, and people are both distracted and tired from fighting this for so long.
I'll try to make resistance easier by collecting some suggested actions below, with links.
It was nearly two years ago that I wrote this article[1] about the EU #ChatControl surveillance directive on behalf of the @cryptpad team.
Very little has changed since then. Experts in technology, law, and policy all agree that the proposal undermines basic European rights, that it will be abused by authoritarian member states, and that the proposed tech solutions cannot possibly do the job the supporting legislators have claimed.
@ansuz@cryptpad I agree with the fact that encryption is a fundamental part of democracy.
But the problem is that I have not seen proposals on how to handle a situation where encryption is used by actors who want to undermine democracy, hiding their actions via encryption.
E.g. A foreign state actor using telegram in a combined randsomware-against-hosptitals and disinformation campaign, this to cause social unrest and inlluence people to vote tor more-extremist parties.
I don't know for sure that these offices are elected. start with these contact points, after that you can still feel free to contact your MEPs, but start here
Tencent's part of the leak alone included 1.5 Billion account credentials. Twitter's part is 281 Million.
I highly recommend reviewing whether you use any affected sites and changing both their passwords and those on any other platform where a similar password might have been used.
I think this is the third time I'm reading a 100+ page document to see the exact language used to describe exactly who will be targeted by this legislation, and what safeguards will be in place.
Spoiler alert: it's still an absolute dumpster-fire
"Recital 12a" is interesting. It seems mostly geared towards excluding the "national security" apparatus from any measures that might be introduced by the legislation, but it also uses some pretty broad language that could include some other groups.
> Accordingly,
this Regulation should not apply to interpersonal communications services that are not
available to the general public and the use of which is instead restricted to persons
involved in the activities of a particular company, organisation, body or authority
I'm guessing this was included thanks to industry lobbying, but I can see it being useful for others if the legislation passes in the proposed form. Maybe the self-hosted group-chat can be framed as some kind of organisation and get an exemption?
That probably won't work for anything that federates, though, as it's murky as to whether they could be considered as "limited to persons..."
"Recital 12a" is interesting. It seems mostly geared towards excluding the "national security" apparatus from any measures that might be introduced by the legislation, but it also uses some pretty broad language that could include some other groups.
> Accordingly,
this Regulation should not apply to interpersonal communications services that are not
available to the general public and the use of which is instead restricted to persons
involved in the activities of a particular company, organisation,...
After several years of closely following their legal cases I finally signed up as a supporting member of @noybeu.
It's so refreshing to see a non-profit hosting their site with prominent links to their RSS feed and mastodon account, and without a single third-party tracking script in sight 😍
+ does exactly what its name suggests
+ works most of the time
git rebase:
- not a common verb
- uses re- prefix although there's no "git base"
- literally does historical revisionism
- gaslights anyone who knows the truth
- probably kicks puppies when you aren't looking
- constantly wrecking shit
- basically only exists for "aesthetics"
- forces you into learning about "reflog"
my partner and I finally chopped up the pineapple fruit from the plant that has been growing for about two years. not very big, but very sweet and flavourful.