@pixelfed What is the main difference between this and fediverse.party?
Top-level
7 comments
@dansup @pixelfed @jason123santafediverse.party has a lot more dataIn this regard, isn't there a way to just take the data from there? In other words, aren't there public databases of fediverse apps and clients that can just be shared between such sites? Like database version of the fediverse-related delightful lists.
cc @humanetech @tommi @jason123santa @pixelfed While I understand where you are coming from, it's sort of ironic that you want a centralized resource for a decentralized network. The fact that there is so many different fediverse websites is important and a good thing, can you imagine if there was only one? @tommi Most things here are run by volunteers. It does make sense to centralize some general information about it all. But, unlike Wikipedia, we can't realistically guarantee that any site will always be stable for years to come. We don't have the resources needed to provide such guarantees. For example, fediverse.space was lucky to be revived by a new maintainer, but fediverse.network went down forever. By duplicating information the community makes sure everything won't disappear at once. @lightone I understand, but my argument is to unite in one common great forkable dataset all of the info and the codebase, then of course the website could be moved, change ownership and maintainer. My point is: if I pose myself the question “I need all of the most up to date and comprehensive data and information, where do I go?” I do not have a unique answer… I should have, though. Maybe @humanetech has the answer. |
@jason123santa @pixelfed fediverse.party has a lot more data, and is generally more useful. This is meant to compliment resources like fediverse.party with features like the People Directory