Gregory's Server@ErikUden I asked Gemini Advanced the same question and I guess I got the opposite:
|
24 comments
 @Jerry I hope this disregard for fundamental rights by AI is something that will make people deeply reflect the implementation of this horrid software everywhere. @yours_truly @ErikUden   @asakiyume @ErikUden @Jerry I made a mistake, the common usage is: @asakiyume @ErikUden @Jerry They are totally ignorant and repeat things they have lumped together. They are BS generation tools and our minds search for meaning in their steaming pile of feces. Kind of like listening to some politicians. @asakiyume @ErikUden @Jerry Just wanted you to be aware of the term that is commonly used. Also did not want to take credit for a term of art.   @ErikUden @Jerry Whoever added them obviously has a piece missing in their head if they thought "job done, it's OK to just say whether a group of people deserve to be free and live in peace is subjective and a complex question"  Actually I'd prefer: you are asking a machine and a machine is not fit to decide who deserves what. As someone who has worked in the field, I see these answers in a very different light. Chat GTP sounds actually confused as to whether whether Palestinians should have rights. This is likely based on the amount of material it is ingested suggesting that giving them a state would be difficult and troublesome. Google's response, on the other hand, sounds like you hit a guardrail. Google is programmed to look for political Hot topics and refuse to participate in the conversation.  |
@Jerry Complete opposite and again a disregard for human rights. Is there any AI that just says “Yes” no matter what ethnicity or nationality a person has??